Coto de Caza, California is a census-designated place and guard-gated private community in the unincorporated Trabuco Canyon area of Orange County, California. As of the 2000 census, the CDP had a total population of 13,057
Coto de Caza - City Info |Coto de Caza - County Info |Coto de Caza - Yahoo Info |Coto de Caza Real Estate Trends | Coto de Caza Profile | Coto de Caza News | Coto de Caza - 1983 Movie | Coto de Caza Directory | Coto de Caza Philharmonic | OC Board of Supervisors | Coto De Caza - Plan Review | Coto de Caza - Photos | Coto de Caza Census- 2000 | Coto de Caza Speed Bumps |Maps and aerial photos
Lawless, Values-less, Spiritual-less Coto de Caza
January 11, 2006
When we first
moved to Coto de Caza over 12 years ago, we really thought there was No Place
Like Coto. Shortly thereafter
CNN/Money discovered Coto as well and included it in their list of One of the
Best Places to Live/Best Places to Retire.
When the real
estate market started to heat up and the Coto population started to turn, and we
began to see a different Coto: A
good number of adults with over-inflated egos.
We heard of a case where an individual got angry and simply mooned his
neighbors. In yet another case, an
individual followed a district delegate collecting signatures stating the
delegate had dropped out. Then
there was the conversation of former board members who reminisced about how easy
it was to settle an issue: simply
lie – residents could then not do anything about settling grievances.
things started to escalate: We
heard board candidates declare that if elected, they would never hold dual
seats: As delegates and as board
members. The LID (lie, ignore or
deny) has now been mastered even by service providers.
Then, not wanting to be a police state, law enforcement was practically
banned from Coto de Caza for the last three years.
Consequences? The line
between adult and children behavior around Coto de Caza has been blurred, rule
of law no longer applies, accident rates has multiplied, as has vandalism and
CNN/Money has dropped Coto de Caza from their Best Places to Live/Best Places to
Lawrence Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Reasoning: (http://www.nd.edu/~rbarger/kohlberg.htm)
Kohlberg’s basic premise was that human beings go through stages in their moral development that are tied to their cognitive development. The stages progress from very simplistic thinking about right and wrong to very complex and differentiated thinking including moral relativism. He was less interested in the choices that people make than he was in their reasons for making those choices. The reasons behind the actions are crucial to understanding individuals’ levels of moral reasoning.
Kohlberg described three main levels of moral development with two stages in each level:
1) LEVEL ONE: PRE-CONVENTIONAL
Stage One: Punishment and Obedience Orientation. Children in this stage of reasoning equate right and wrong with the dictates of authority and the punishment associated with a given action.
Stage Two: Instrumental Relativist Orientation. Children in this stage of reasoning begin to factor their own wants and needs in their choices. If something satisfies the child’s own needs, then it is worth the risk of punishment.
2) LEVEL TWO: CONVENTIONAL
Stage Three: Interpersonal Concordance Orientation. Children in this stage of reasoning are often entering adolescence, and become concerned with what is good for others. There is a pre-occupation with being a “good” girl or boy. They have a larger perspective, and see themselves as part of a society with its rules and regulations.
Stage Four: Law and Order Orientation. Individuals in this stage of reasoning have an increased sense of social order. They tend to rely more on “the rules” as laid out by the society to make their moral choices. Maintaining social order and doing one’s duty are important.
3) LEVEL THREE: POSTCONVENTIONAL
Stage Five: Social Contract-Legalistic Orientation. Individuals in this stage maintain their emphasis on social order, but they see it less as a black-and-white set of rules and more as mutually-agreed-upon standards. They also factor in the individual’s rights when making moral choices. They don’t see the social system as perfect, but believe that it is still necessary to avoid chaos.
Stage Six: Universal Ethical-Principle Orientation. Kohlberg’s final (and most controversial) stage is meant to represent the epitome of human moral reasoning. Individuals in this stage realize that sometimes what is chosen democratically is not necessarily in the best interest of the society. They make their moral choices based on their internal ethical standards, which take into account the universal good (Dworezky & Davis, 1989).
Kohlberg claims that most adults are functioning somewhere within the conventional level. What about Coto de Caza adults? What is the level Coto de Caza residents typically function at?
Moral Reasoning in Corporate America:
One of the
questions we like to ask is to review the list below and try to figure out a
common denominator based on stories by the Wall Street Journal.
To date, no one has gotten it:
the Wall Street Journal, either individuals or their respective companies listed
above have been involved in some sort of ethical lapse in the last three years.
Given the diversity of the companies and individuals involved, one could argue then that Coto de Caza is simply a microcosm of what goes on around the rest of the nation. Perhaps this is a good research question for another time. Meanwhile, paraphrasing an old politician:
Coto de Caza, so close to Hollywood and so far away from God!
The CHP was fired in early 2003 by the current Coto de Caza
board of directors without a suitable alternative for traffic patrol.
Then the board refused to take calls from the CHP and refused to allow board
meeting time for traffic prevention awareness - but readily turned over a
meeting to producers of Reality TV Show. Has been unable to provide
evidence of due diligence when it fired the largest private security company and
replaced it with one of the smallest ones in the region ($1,700,000/year), but
is haggling with the CHP for a 40 hour/week patrol service for measly
Primary Collision Factors By Percentage as reported by the CHP are as follows:
property location (other than driver)
Signs, lane changes, unsafe turns, center lane, etc.
COTO CRIME RATE
of November 2004, three Orange County cities were ranked among the safest cities
in the country, according to an annual ranking based on the FBI's 2003 crime
statistics. Mission Viejo and Lake Forest were ranked the fourth- and
sixth-safest cities, respectively. Irvine ranked 11th. Coto de Caza
did poorly in comparison – see below
CNN/MONEY Nov. 6, 2004
December 2005, CNN/Money has dropped Coto de Caza out of its Best Places to Live
with population under 100,000.
| Post comment | Read Comments |
Fair Use Notice
FAIR USE NOTICE