COTOBUZZ NEWSLETTER NOVEMBER 2004

Duty is ours, result's are God's

THE BURNING OF CZOTO

.....oversight

November, 2004

The more diverse the points of view, the broader the vision!

TABLE OF CONTENTS:

click on any topic below to read or simply scroll down.................may take a few minutes to load

 

Note:  AOL users shall be getting a text-only issue - send email to cotobuzz@yahoo.com if you prefer text version.

 

USALAND

 

A.  TALES FROM THE LEFT COAST

B.  FIGHT TERRORISM

 

COTOLAND

 

A.  COTO DE CAZA PRIORITIES

B.  OPEN LETTER TO CZ - REQUEST FOR RETRACTION

C.  THE CZ BOARD DOES NOT WANT YOU!

D.  WHY CZ CANCELLED CHP CONTRACT - An Analogy

E.  A GATE WITHIN A GATE - THE VILLAGE TRIBE

F.  ASK COTOLADY - SECURITY WITHIN COTO DE CAZA

G.  HOA RACKETS

H.  LOS VERMINS aka LOS VERDES CZLOCK

I.  WHY LIVE IN A GATED COMMUNITY? 

J.  COTO INTERACTIVE DISCUSSION FORUM - YOU ARE BUZZED!

K.  THE NORTH GATE - A WEAK LINK? - the $160,000 SOLUTION!

 


TALES FROM THE LEFT COAST

Like many other celebrities, Paul Newman pledged that if President George W. Bush was re-elected, he would leave the country.  In this case, Newman threatened to move to Ireland.  After the election, an Utah disc jockey published an open letter.  Paraphrasing its content, the disk jockey was letting Newman know that the jockey's listeners had contributed an average of $5.00 per person to purchase a one way airplane ticket to Ireland scheduled for December 6, 2004.

In case Newman declined the ticket, the funds were going to go to an organization helping provide for the US troops, "...since we are sure that you do support our troops"!

NORTH GATE- THE WEAK LINK

Handling of the North Gate continues to be a hotly debated issue.  In typical CZ fashion, the board says that "..w  are well aware of how the North Gate was a weak link, with kids propping the gate open to let friends in.  All of that is being factored into a re-design of the gate, including vandal-resistant mechanisms and cameras.  At a cost of $160,000 per year to man the gate we can afford to do a lot of things t0 strengthen the gate".

Perhaps it is this piecemeal approach to security that gives Coto de Caza the imfamous distinction of having a higher crime rate than other non-gated and much more densly populated neighbors.  Perhaps they never read the former Security Director's The  State of Security White Paper, or the Proposed 2005 CZ Goals and Objectives prepared by CotoBuzz.  Planning a $160,000 expense while the Village People proceed with their Gate within a Gate strategy in light of the former security directors assertions of overhead required to administer violations by this renegade group seems like an oxymoron.

Coto de Caza Priorities - Security

As we follow the activity in the Coto Discussion Forum, it is clear that Security is not only a huge priority for Coto residents, but most of us have definite ideas as to what needs to be done about it.  The subject matter is so complex, eliciting strong reaction that it is obvious that current CZ Board communication methods are ineffective and as a result their decision making process may be flawed.  One more reason why the current board should be using the Coto Interactive Discussion Forum to get the benefit of previous board members and long time residents.  

Traffic Control - The CHP Fired from Coto:

A vivid example is the CZ board’s decision to discontinue the use of the CHP as a proactive law enforcement element.  The board’s stated reason for such action is cost reduction.  When pressed, the board states that the number of citations issued by the CHP were at a minimum, a view consistent with that of the former gate access committee chairperson who thinks there is little that can be done with regards to public safety   “ ….. really folks, there are accidents every day on every road in the State.  There is nothing CZ can do to have CZ accident free. Heck, people even run over their own kids in their own driveways.  Get real. Like I said, I'll bet the number of accidents in a given time frame with the CHP and in the same time frame without the CHP would be equal”.

However, it looks like the CZ board did not have access to reliable safety information prior to 2003.  Further, the information supplied to Coto residents by the CZ board,  with the 2004-2005 budget justifying the decision to terminate the CHP contract was incorrect.  This has prompted for numerous requests to the CZ Board and Keystone for a retraction.  The reasoning is that if Keystone issues retraction letters for trivial matters such as “..interpretation of Rules with regards to parking….”, they should issue a retraction letter when it impacts the top priority for Coto residents.    I was shocked to read the incorrect information concerning cancellation of our CHP contract in the letter from the Board to homeowners which was included in the budget packet. Shocked to read that the Board chose to cancel the contract based on incorrect information. …. The low number of citations is a direct result of the CHP operating in Coto for the past 4 years-hooray! It worked! The possibility of the sheriff conducting pro-active traffic
control is either months away or non-existent. How about a retraction? I would like to fully understand the reasoning behind this decision and if it was based on this incorrect information, maybe the Board ought to take another vote”, stated a Coto Discussion Forum participant.

In an effort to understand the type of information available to the CZ board, we requested from Keystone copies of traffic incident reports from 2002- to date, but were surprised to find that  “…. incident reports are only made available to parties directly involved in specific incidents subject to Board approval.  Incident reports may include calls the CHP/Sheriff’s Dept. responded to but only if the security/patrol company also responded”, according to a Keystone representative.   We confirmed that  accident information is not available to Coto residents, and that the information provided to the CZ board by Keystone or Securitas is incomplete.  So, we decided to go directly to the  most reliable source:  The CHP.  The CHP confirmed that they have the most accurate information available since the Sheriff’s office is not allowed to investigate accidents.

Reported accidents in Coto from 2002-2004 year to date

  • 2002 - 15

  • 2003 – 19

  • 2004 – 22, through November 22, 2004

This represents a 47% increase in accidents in Coto from 2002.

 Further, 75 of all accidents between 2002-2004 to date have happened in three different roads:

ACCIDENT LOCATION

%

 

 

Coto Drive

42%

Vista Del Verde

27%

San Miguel

6%

 

 

Sub-Total

75%

Security Costs

There is also debate not only as to the effectiveness of the dynamic duo,  Keystone and Securitas with regards  to security, but also the breakdown, even when taken directly from the budget presented by the CZ board to Coto residents:

Coto's annual budget for Gate Attendant is $1,236,700.  Divide the $1,236,700 by the 8760 hours, then Coto is paying $141.18 per hour to  staff the gates.

Coto's annual budget for Patrol Service is $322,432. Taking the same 8760 hours per year and dividing the $322,432 by 8760 hours, then Coto is paying $36.81 per hour for Patrol Service.

Coto's Transponder Installation budget in $84,654 for 2005. The Sports Park Office is open 40 hours per week. Taking the 40 hours per week times 52 weeks per year gives 2080 hours per year. Dividing the $84,654 by 2080 hours gives an hourly total of $40.70 to install transponders!

Gate Attendant---------$141.18 per hour
Patrol Service-----------$  36.81 per hour
Transponder Install----$  40.70 per hour

Total Securitas       $ 218.69 per hour

Bear in mind that this is the same outfit that over-invoiced the CZ $168,000 and recently asked employees to stop using their standard “time card process”.

Why live in a Gated Community such as Coto de Caza?

According to the conclusion of the international conference on private urban governance, more then half of all new homes in the U.S. are guarded in some way. This might seem like a somewhat extreme reaction on the American anxiety, but the whole trend towards gated communities could actually be a good thing and a revival of the old Greek ideal of the city-state

The most obvious feature of a gated community is the fact that it is gated. Gated communities also promote freedom. If you don't like the rules of the community, maybe you can change them by engaging in the political process.

A USA Today article states that Gated Communities are not just for the wealthy:

“The popularity of gated communities is on the rise nationwide, according to developers and housing experts. In a nation still confronting post-9/11 jitters, living behind walls and knowing your neighbors create a safety zone for many. Security is also a top concern for baby boomers as they head toward retirement”.  Why people cherish life behind gates or walls usually starts with safety.

"I moved here from Charlotte, N.C.," says Marcia Newton, 63, a flight attendant for the New Orleans Hornets basketball team, which switched cities earlier this year. "When I came to New Orleans, I thought, 'Oh, my God, all the crime.' "

It should be comforting to know that recently Three Orange County cities are among the safest  cities in the country, according to an annual ranking based on the FBI's 2003 crime statistics.  Mission Viejo and Lake Forest were ranked the fourth- and sixth-safest cities, respectively. Irvine ranked 11th.   And just as quickly, reality sets in when comparing Coto de Caza crime figures with those of its non-gated neighbors (source:  CNN Money):  

COTO DE CAZA

Population: 13,597

 Crime  about crime data

City
Stats

Natl.
Avg.

Rank from
Lo to Hi

(out of 1260)

Personal crime risk
(index based on 100 average;
lower is better)

59  

100 

777 

Property crime risk
(index based on 100 average;
lower is better)
 

41 

100 

282

RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA:

Crime 

City
Stats

Natl.
Avg.

Rank from
Lo to Hi
(out of 1260)

Personal crime risk

 (index based on 100 average;
lower is better)

31  

100 

406 

Property crime risk
(index based on 100 average;
lower is better) 

31 

100 

187 

IRVINE

Population: 150,450

 

 Crime  (about crime data)

City
Stats

Natl.
Avg.

Rank from
Lo to Hi

(out of 1260)

Personal crime risk
(index based on 100 average;
lower is better)

125  

100 

1,066 

Property crime risk
(index based on 100 average;
lower is better)
 

63 

100 

568 

LAKE FOREST
Population: 61,091

 

 Crime  (about crime data)

City
Stats

Natl.
Avg.

Rank from
Lo to Hi

(out of 1260)

Personal crime risk
(index based on 100 average;
lower is better)

28  

100 

341 

Property crime risk
(index based on 100 average;
lower is better)
 

24 

100 

142

Traffic Enforcement - Background

Traffic committees had been recommending some kind of enforcement for years.

Previous boards did not think self enforcement could work and were, reticent about going it. These boards  fought the  removal of the speed bumps for this reason.  With no speed bumps and a larger volume of traffic, previous  boards began self enforcement almost.  Many homeowners were compliant and paid fines; the worst offenders did not. Security provided reports of teenagers driving Coto Drive at speeds of 80+ without  stopping!  Security followed some of  these kids home and  had a talk with the parents. Parents refused to cooperate! Shocking you say?  Remember, this is Coto, were our kids have an "Eye Problem"!

There were other problems with self enforcement. Those homeowners refusing to pay fines could only be  compelled through small claims court and a board member and/or management or Legal representative had to be there as well. Coto’s  speed limits could not be supported in court.

The board ordered a traffic study to establish legally supportable speed limits. Self enforcement didn't work. Many residents were angry at the raised speed limits although the traffic study reported these  were the speeds that were currently being driven! The board then took the next step and  complied with California vehicle code and changed out the required signage.

It should be noted that as soon as the announcement was made that the contract with CHP would not be renewed there was a noticeable change in speeds on Coto Drive.

Might the fact that Coto de Caza traffic accident rate is increasing and crime statistics are  higher than those of its neighboring non-gated communities be a self-fulfilling prophesy?    That is, paraphrasing the previous gate access committee chairperson  “ …there is nothing CZ can do to minimize crime,  Heck, people even run over their own kids in their own driveways.  Get real..”, or should we as a community stop impersonating an ostrich when it comes to overall security?    As the mayor pro tem of Thousand Oaks,  one of the safest cities in the US might say:  "Public safety is our primary concern.  We will do everything in our power to keep our city safe".

It should be noted that CotoBuzz prepared the most comprehensive security strategic plan ever in the history of Coto de Caza, for the benefit of the current CZ board.  This was done little over one year ago, and what do we have in return......?  Higher crime rate and increased traffic accidents!

FIGHT TERRORISM

http://www.divestterror.org/

Coto Discussion Forum Alive and Thriving

Currently, the forum can be accessed by the CZ Board, residents from the Estates, Villages and CZ Masters.  Subjects covered include the Dead Oak Trees, Cumulative Voting, the Brewing Revolt, Security, etc.....  Get your Swiss Knife - join the Coto Discussion Forum

 

When participants violate the Cotobuzz guidelines, they will be BUZZED three times.  The third BUZZ will come along with an automatic ban from the discussion forum.

We suggest you obtain a free email account such as Yahoo or Hotmail.  Since you can post and download pictures and files, we also recommend you have you antivirus software updated.  If you need help setting up, send us email at cotobuzz@yahoo.com 

CotoBuzz is open to all Coto de Caza residents, regardless of political affiliation, personal or professional agenda.

Mutual respect – we may not agree, but we recognize we all have a right to express ourselves without fear of retribution. We express ourselves without resorting to personal abuse or name-calling.

Subscribe to the COTO Discussion/Chat Forum - customize how you want to receive information: Daily, Weekly, etc. District Pictures, CotoLand Pictures, Coto Events, Coto Issues, and other goodies!
Powered by groups.yahoo.com

Coto De Caza District Photos

The Coto Discussion Forum includes photos of representative Coto Districts (currently 14 districts represented,..... add yours), Coto de Caza issues, such as the Dead Oaks Trees, Road Repairs, CotoLand, etc.

 

Coto Mailing List

Join the mailing list
Enter your name and email address:
Name:
Email:  
Subscribe      Unsubscribe

 

 

ASK COTO LADY:

  

QUESTION RE: SECURITY WITHIN COTO DE CAZA 

I understand that crime is higher in Coto de Caza than its neighboring non-gated communities.  I also understand that traffic accidents are on the raise within Coto.  However, the board says that pro-active CHP enforcement is not necessary.  Others such as the former gate access director says that there is nothing that CZ can do about this.

Is this true?

--  Running scared..

 

Dear RS:

The idea that a gated community is safer than a non-gated community is predicated upon good community management and resident accountability.    Security experts will tell you that first, you have to know who the enemy is, then execute a comprehensive security program.  In Coto, this would include pro-active traffic enforcement, aggressive prosecution of parents who refuse to reign in on their teen unruly siblings and of course model the rule of law.  When board directors unilaterally decide to open certain gates (such as Oakview/Oaknoll) for their own convenience, cancel CHP contracts without due diligence and in general refusing to listen to expert security advice,  you can very much predict what the outcome may be.

 Refer to State of Security White Paper written by Former Security Director, specifically for the current board, as well as Proposed 2005 CZ Goals and Objectives prepared by CotoBuzz - and never acted upon by current CZ Board. (click on links). 

HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION RACKETS

Lawyers and developers use the management companies to "manage" their housing mills while they are selling houses in them

After 4 years of trying the "civilized route" - including testifying to my legislators, asking every "government" attorney to help and getting told that "it's a private contract matter - take em to court" I discovered something else. We have been denied access to Justice in court by the promulgation of laws that protect the Homeowner Association managers and incumbents when they break the law…

Read More...

 

THE CZ BOARD DOES NOT WANT YOU!

Officially one only needs to be a Coto resident to participate as a volunteer in the CZ Board.  Volunteers are encouraged to participate with the following boiler plate sentence from Keystone when the subject comes up:

“Regarding volunteers, the Board always has encouraged volunteers …”

However, when we were ready to maintain the Los Verdes area until such a time as the CZ Board and Los Verdes sub-association had concluded their squabbling, we were told not to do anything, since they had “major breakthroughs..”.  That was over six months ago!

We also volunteered for the Gate Access Committee, Security Committee, Governance Committee and Audit Committee.  To date, we have not heard from Keystone nor the Board. The first attempt at volunteering with this board was over 12 months ago!

Various CotoBuzz readers have expressed similar experience.    The Board does not want you.

WHY CZ CANCELLED CHP CONTRACT

 

With the number of accidents reported by the CHP, up 47% since the CHP contract was cancelled, crime within Coto higher than neighboring non-gated communities, and the current CZ board continued efforts to defend their "cost reduction " decision to cancel the CHP contract, while doling out the pork for the benefit of the Equestrian Center,  CotoCAN , subsidizing the Coto Life Style for the Estates and Villages and others, & increasing the monthly dues, we were wondering what kind of decision making framework the CZ board had in place.  Someone finally explained it to us using the following analogy: 

The Japanese eat very little fat and suffer fewer   heart attacks than the British or Americans.

The French eat a lot of fat and also suffer fewer heart attacks than the British or Americans.

The Japanese drink very little red wine and suffer fewer heart attacks than the British or Americans.

The Italians drink excessive amounts of red wine And  also suffer fewer heart attacks than the British or Americans

CONCLUSION

Eat and drink what you like. Speaking English  apparently what kills  you.

 

REQUEST FOR RETRACTION:

 

The CZ board recently spent time and money in an attempt to set the record straight in regards to trivial matters such as the “correct wording of certain rules and regulations….”

 

It is only reasonable to expect that major flaws in information sent out to Coto residents dealing with the number one Coto issue – security,  as it relates to CHP cost and performance will be dealt with swiftly.  It should be noted that the errors contained in that letter were brought to the attention of a board member, numerous times, and the corrections never made it to print!

As a minimum, we request  retracting the letter and making sure that every Coto resident who received a copy of the 2005 Budget will get the updated information, and perhaps a new reason why the CHP contract was cancelled in light of increase in traffic accidents from 2002- year to date.

A GATE WITHIN A GATE - THE VILLAGE TRIBE

Taking a page out of the CZ board decision making framework, the Village People continue their efforts to build a gate within Coto.  They figure the CZ Ghetto's crime and accident rate is too high for their liking, even though CZ residents are subsidizing their Coto lifestyle at the tune of over $9 million/year.

Unless the Village people are ready to do something the current CZ Board has been unwilling or unable to do, they need to understand that " ..the worst offenders ddo not pay fines and will defend their reckless teens even while they drive at speeds of 80+ without  stopping"

 

CZ Maintenance Clock (ZCLOCK) maintenance

ZCLOCK is currently tracking the times it takes to resolve three issues:

 Los Vermins aka Los Verdes:  555 days since last major maintenance in Coto Drive/Los Verdes area.

Keystone's last report states that the CZ Board and Los Vermis have finally agreed on the "exhibit" - At this rate, The City of Coto may take over before the issue is settled?

For ZCLOCK items, send mail to cotobuzz@yahoo.com 

Read More...

 

AOL FILTERS

Because AOL has changed some of its spam filters, AOL may be inadvertently preventing the delivery of CotoBuzz to some of its readers.  Please forward this newsletter to your AOL friends and ask them to check their spam filters and contact AOL if necessary.

COTOBUZZ VISION

COTOBUZZ is a change agent to transform the historically confrontational, antagonistic Coto culture by maximizing resident involvement and facilitating communication between the board, residents and service providers, and eventually develop a sense of community and civic pride while maintaining the Coto Life Style we all have come to love.

TERMS OF USE

Terms of Use

COTOBUZZ SUBSCRIPTION:  WWW.COTOBUZZ.COM

Forward this newsletter to your Coto friends and neighbors. Ask them to sign up for their own copy (free) at www.cotobuzz.com  You are receiving this newsletter because you have confirmed your subscription at www.cotobuzz.com, you are a CZ Master Association delegate, service provider or interested party.  To cancel your subscription, contact:

Buzz cotobuzz@yahoo.com   P.O. Box 154                    Trabuco Canyon, CA 92678 fax/messages: 8153611721

The views of collaborators, service providers or invited guests do not necessarily reflect those of CotoBuzz

Advertising in CotoBuzz

For advertising in the CotoBuzz newsletter details, click here:

-- Chief Editor, nom de plume:                        Buzz McAguire

-- Webmaster:  Joseph Lewis Aguirre

cotobuzz@yahoo.com 

 

 (c) www.cotobuzz.com, all rights reserved

 

http://www.cotobuzz.com