|
Simply
click on the underlined text for the rest of the story!
Halloween
is Here: The Silencing of the Lamb:
Michael
Moore is acclaimed for his anti-administration
fabrications in the 9/11 documentary.
And Harold Pintner is awarded the literature
Nobel Prize, as the academy calls the prolific
political playwright, “the towering figure
USC
Versus Notre Dame
- 10/15/2005 - The Play - Freeze frame picture of the
play that kept USC as the number one ranked team in
the nation.
From
Associated Press
Southern
California's last-second win over Notre Dame was
seen by 30 million viewers, making it the most
watched regular-season college football game in nine
years - Link to LA Time Article 10-/20/05[ Read
More ]
Silencing
District Delegates
- The CZ Master Association for some reason refuses to
respond to any of our questions, despite what the GM
stated in previous letters to residents:
STOP
THE SPEEDING IN COTO NOW! - A Letter to CotoBuzz
- I am sad to say that there was
another MAJOR traffic accident this morning at the
intersection of Coto de Caza Drive and Summit Accent.
One car was completely demolished as it was hit by a
large SUV. How long are these type of accidents going
to continue until the current Board of Directors
realizes that they are responsible for the traffic
safety in Coto de Caza?
HOLD
POLITICIANS ACCOUNTABLE - VOTE!: CALIFORNIA
PROPOSITION RECOMMENDATIONS
-
VOTE
YES ON PROPOSITION 74:
-
VOTE
YES ON PROPOSITION 75:
-
VOTE
YES ON PROPOSITION 76:
- VOTE
YES ON PROPOSITION 77:
CotoBuzz
Is On a Roll!: SB 194
- Cotobuzz has More Success with California
Legislature than with CZ Association! - As
long time CotoBuzz readers know, Security tops the
list in terms of our concerns – and we believe the
majority of Coto residents.
In the past, we lobbied the CZ BOD to look into
the proper certification of security guards
Eminent
Despotism -
by
Senator Tom McClintock In
the days of the old Republic, Americans lived secure
in their homes safe in the knowledge that the
fundamental responsibility of government was to
protect their lives and property from anyone who
threatened them - no matter how rich, powerful or
well-connected. Read
More... |
About:
CotoBuzz Background -
As
you all may know, I am a district delegate and
publisher of CotoBuzz, a digital newspaper distributed
regionally and syndicated nationwide.
In this newspaper, we use at least three
different tools:
Differences
Between News and Satire -
Selected
headlines of stories that CotoBuzz has broken, and
which have not received any meaningful coverage from
the local media either due to lack of interest, lack
of resources or lack of skills, but certainly relevant
to Coto de Caza homeowners:
Satire
- a Brief
on use of Satire
- There
is a large body of work establishing the use of
effective political satire.
Experts posit that the best satire is one where
the reader is unable to distinguish fact from fiction.
For example:
10
Things a Home Owners Association Wont' Tell You - a
Yahoo Article -
"We
Can't Wait to Get Our Hands on Your Money -- Or Even
Your Home."
A
gardening violation. That's what landed Jeffrey
DeMarco in hot water with his Rancho Santa Fe, Calif.,
homeowners association a few years ago:
10
CZ Non Compliance Issues - as described by Montecito
Resident
- The
Association is unaware of its own responsibilities as
stated in the governing documents. Research
the association governing documents to see what is
typically authorized in the documents.
COTO
DISCUSSION FORUM
- For exclusive use of Coto residents. Residency
is verified.
COTO
MAILING LIST
- Sign up to receive your monthly issue of CotoBuzz -
available free to qualified subscribers, including
residents of the Canyons and service providers.
ARCHIVED
CotoBuzz
Newsletters

HOLD
POLITICIANS ACCOUNTABLE - VOTE!: CALIFORNIA
PROPOSITION RECOMMENDATIONS
VOTE YES ON PROPOSITION 74: We attended California public schools in the 1960’s.
To this date, we have fond memories of our
teachers from Art, Journalism, Languages, and History
to Biology and Mathematics.
Factually and anecdotally, California public
schools were some of the best in the nation.
Currently, we teach undergraduate and graduate
students who can barely write their names.
Something really bad happened since then: Lack of Accountability
VOTE YES ON PROPOSITION 75: Unions have lost a lot of ground over the last decade.
There is a reason for it:
Union bosses lack of accountability:
VOTE YES ON PROPOSITION 76: Consider the California budget as a family budget – Do not
spend what you do not have:
Legislature accountability
VOTE YES ON PROPOSITION 77: What
about professional politicians?
Just like the local ones, they must be held
accountable
STOP
THE SPEEDING IN COTO NOW! - A Letter to CotoBuzz
| From: |
RWABellamy |
| Date: |
Tue,
4 Oct 2005 14:35:41 EDT |
| Subject: |
Traffic
Accident |
| To: |
CotoBuzz@Yahoo.com |
RWABellamy
wrote:
I am sad to say that there was another MAJOR traffic
accident this morning at the intersection of Coto de
Caza Drive and Summit Accent. One car was completely
demolished as it was hit by a large SUV. How long are
these type of accidents going to continue until the
current Board of Directors realizes that they are
responsible for the traffic safety in Coto de Caza?
STOP
THE SPEEDING IN COTO NOW!
|
To:
|
CotoBuzz@yahoogroups.com
|
|
From:
|
"Buzz @CotoBuzz" <cotobuzz@yahoo.com>
|
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 Oct 2005 14:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
Subject:
|
[COTO] STOP THE SPEEDING IN COTO NOW!
|
Bob:
In
our conversations with CHP management, they do not
refer to these incidents as accidents, since they
are preventable through pro-active enforcement 101.
There are three Coto roads where most of the
accidents occur, Coto de Caza drive as expected, is
one of them.
In
our humble opinion, board members, the property
manager and legal counsel should be held liable, as
the picture painted for them for over three years
could not be any clearer – yet they refuse to even
acknowledge the problem – rather they blame
everyone else (evolution, soccer moms and previous
boards, for example), but themselves!
BUZZ
I
had a chance to speak to a CHP officer (no, I
pulled HIM over) to report a hazard on Antonio.
I asked him if the CHP ever came into COTO.
His response "they kicked us out, I don't
know the politics". Adding the this
he said "that's a free-for-all in there.
When we patrolled, it was like shooting fish in
a barrel."
Nice
to know such things are said about us.
Greetings:
Your
experience with the CHP is consistent with what we
have been reporting for the last three years.
Makes
you wonder what the president of the board is really
thinking when he cites the inability of the CZ Master
Association BOD to contract directly with the
Sheriff’s department, when he fired the CHP - the
only tried and true solution.
By
the way, since the BOD’s hiring of UPS on a
“minimum level of service – so we can spend the
money somewhere else more important, the number of
kids using motor scooters has increased exponentially.
To be clear, we love to see Coto kids play on
the streets. However,
recalling the old adage from the Flight Rules:
In the ongoing battle between
objects made of aluminum going hundreds of miles an
hour and the ground going zero miles an hour, the
ground has yet to lose.
In this case, the Coto kids are going to lose
to "speeding Soccer Moms every time.
And the CZ BOD?
Laughing all the way to the welfare line to
dispense of the “extra funds”!
Silencing
a District Delegate - The CZ Master
Association for some reason refuses to respond to any
of our questions, despite what the GM stated in
previous letters to residents:
As
district delegate, I was asked to join my districts
walkthrough, June 4, 2005, with the landscaping consultant, the service provider and
certain members of the landscaping committee.
Keystone employees were not present.
Walkthrough
reveal that most of the district was in desperate need
of renovation. I suggested to the consultants that due to district
conditions, Acacias may be the wrong plant for the
area.
Mosaic
consultant followed up with an observation report on
June 16. Mostly
a pictorial report with comments – very much
consistent with our observations.
July
17 2005, we followed up with Keystone with following
questions:
·
It
is good to see that work has started, obviating the
poor status of dis-repairs in the irrigation system.
·
Given
that the work is coming along slowly, can you please
provide me with a schedule so I can monitor the
progress, or lack thereof?
·
Also,
given that it took so long to identify the maintenance
problem with the irrigation system, once it is fully
in operation, is it possible to develop a simple test
procedure so that a property representative, a
landscaping committee member, a delegate or even a
concerned resident can periodically inspect it and
test it?
Since we did not get a response to this question, we followed up on
9/6/2005 with the following message:
I never received a response to this
message:
Is the landscaping work supposed to be
complete now? If not, when?
There are still a number of dead or near
dead Acacias. I am also not sure if all the
leaks in the irrigation system have been taken care
of.
For you reference, I still do not have a
response to my questions on the Maxicom system either.
Eminent
Despotism
- by
Senator Tom McClintock
|
In
the days of the old Republic, Americans lived
secure in their homes safe in the knowledge that
the fundamental responsibility of government was
to protect their lives and property from anyone
who threatened them - no matter how rich,
powerful or well-connected. If a widow didn't
want to sell her home to a developer, she didn't
have to. That was the end of the matter, unless
the developer sent in thugs to beat her up. And
government was there to protect her from the
thugs. It is now entirely permissible for
government to seize the home of one person for
pennies on the dollar to give it to another -
not for some vital over-arching public
necessity, but simply because the new owner can
pay more taxes than the old.
|
|
Read
More... |
|
CotoBuzz
Is On a Roll!: SB 194 - Cotobuzz has
More Success with California Legislature than with CZ Association!
As
long time CotoBuzz readers know, Security tops the
list in terms of our concerns – and we believe the
majority of Coto residents.
In the past, we lobbied the CZ BOD to look into
the proper certification of security guards – the
request was largely dismissed. We have also
submitted two proposals in an attempt to reform what
at least one Coto resident has referred to a
"corrupt and sleazy" CZ electoral
system. Again, not even an acknowledgement.
However,
we also have lobbied
the California Legislature, the governor and elected
officials: Results: SB194 was signed by the governor last week!
The
purpose of the bill is to ensure that convicted felons
are not hired as security guards – thus they have to
go undergo a background check by the Department of
Justice and pay a filing fee – which is what we had
recommended!
Also
approved was SB137:
The bill allows property managers and
bookkeepers to appear for the association in small
claims court,
as well as AB
098
and SB61.
AB108
defines
the records owners can inspect. It would make
available for inspection, among other things, an
association's general ledger, check register, canceled
checks, invoices, purchase orders, billing statements,
and credit card statements for the current year and
the two previous fiscal years. Minutes for all
years must also be made available. With some
exceptions, associations must make their current
year's records available within 10 days of request and
prior years' records must be made available within 30
days of request.
And
SB61 is described By former board member, Joseph
Morabito as a bill "which will finally
bring democracy to the CZ Master Association and end
our corrupt Delegate Electoral System is not effective
until July 1, 2006."
AB1098
was supported by Assemblyman Todd Spitzer, according
to a spokesperson. However, these bills have
been opposed for the most part, by attorneys
representing home owner's association
So
CotoBuzz is 4/4 with the California Legislature and
0/2 with the CZ Master Association!
Halloween
is Here: The Silencing of the Lamb:
Michael
Moore is acclaimed for his anti-administration
fabrications in the 9/11 documentary.
And Harold Pintner is awarded the literature
Nobel Prize, as the academy calls the prolific
political playwright, “the towering figure”.
So
what does the CotoBuzz Newsletter get for its
political stance?
Right on time for Halloween, attempts at
silencing us for its free speech rights, similar to
those who failed to shut down the IloveLaderaRanch and
SaveMarinHills websites.
The difference in CotoBuzz’s case, is that
Cotobuzz is a bona fide news outlet distributed
regionally and with national distribution through
syndication technology.
Proponents
of shutting down CotoBuzz may use the argument that
First Amendment rights are constructed and framed
within our Constitution are limits of governmental
power, not private power, such as that
vested in homeowners associations (HOA).
Since the HOA is a private entity, and under
normal circumstances,
they cannot be in violation of the Constitution.
However, when a HOA wields power traditionally
held by local government, then
their cute and tidy practices turn into
something much bigger.
In Florida, the courts ruled that the local HOA
had indeed metamorphosed into local
government
If
that is not enough, there
is the SLAPP issue where lawsuits, commonly known as
SLAPP suits are not filed to solve problems:
They are filed to intimidate opponents and
chill citizen rights to participate in public issues
by the threat of extensive, expensive litigation.
Twenty three states have Anti-SLAPP laws on
their books and Congress has encouraged other states
to pass them as well.
Lucky for us, California enacted one of the
most substantive and procedurally comprehensive and
liberal anti-SLAPP statues in the nation (California
Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16), as evidenced
in the statue’s first paragraph:
|
The
Legislature finds and declares that there has
been a disturbing increase in lawsuits brought
primarily to chill valid exercise of the
constitutional rights of freedom of speech and
petition for the redress of grievances.
The Legislature finds and declares that
it is in the public interest to encourage
participation in matters of public
significance, and that this participation
should not be chilled through abuse of the
judicial process.
To this end. This section shall be
construed broadly.
|
And
what about the business judgment rule?
In general, association decisions will be upheld if
they are reasonable and in good faith.
Question of reasonableness depends upon whether
adequate decision making practices were used, and
court will review decision where association cannot
show basis for its conclusion in the record. Riss
v. Angel, 934 P.2d. 669 (Wash. 1997).
Levandusky V One Fifth Avenue Apartment Corp.,
553 NE 2nd 1317 (NY 1990), Francis V
Village Green Owners Assn, 723 P 2nd 573,
229 Cla, Rptr. 456 (CA 1986) ……..etc…..
“The
court criticized the Board for not consulting an
architect prior to reaching its conclusions, which
apparently were based largely upon some rather
amateurish fact finding by the Board President. The
court also emphasized inaccurate statements made by
Board members in attempts to "lobby"
association members when the homeowner sought review
by the association as a whole. In fact, there is
some indication that the real defect in the
association's conduct here was not its decision, but
its process”
Riss
v. Angel, 934 P.2d. 669 (Wash. 1997).
CotoBuzz
Background:
As you all may know, I am a district delegate and
publisher of CotoBuzz, a digital newspaper distributed
regionally and syndicated nationwide.
In this newspaper, we use at least three
different tools: 1) Community journalism patterned after the one promoted by
The Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard
University, Nieman Watchdog.
2) Satire anchored by the political strip
CotoLady – CotoLady is a Puppy Cocker Spaniel and
scheduled to be published in book form shortly and 3)
Publication of the CotoBuzz website (http://www.cotobuzz.com),
TheApprentiCZ website (http://www.theapprenticz.com)
and facilitation of this Coto Discussion Forum,
exclusively for Coto de Caza residents.
CotoBuzz readers are savvy enough to recognize
the difference between the news we report, versus our
use of satire, based on fact.
"We don't make jokes. We
just watch the CZ BOD & report the facts."--Paraphrasing Will Rogers ( 1879 - 1935 )
Since it is possible that Content of the Coto
Discussion Forum can be forwarded to friends, foes or
other interested parties, it is possible that it may
be misunderstood by the English Language I-literati,
or at least twisted in an effort to deny us free
speech rights, like they have tried in Ladera Ranch
and the SaveMarinaHills.org websites.
If you have not visited the Coto Discussion
Forum Welcome page, please note that we have a
warning, with regards to the use of satire and why we
use it.
Please
see difference between CotoBuzz news versus CotoBuzz
satire below:
NEWS:
Selected example of stories that CotoBuzz has
broken, and which have not received any coverage from
the local media either due to lack of interest, lack
of resources or lack of skills, but certainly relevant
to Coto de Caza homeowners:
·
COTO
TRAFFIC ACCIDENT 2H2005 UPDATE- As predicted,
despite the cosmetic actions taken so far (refer to
Reducing Crime according to the GM)
·
COTOBUZZ
EXCLUSIVE: UNDER COVER OF DARKNESS CZ CHANGES
SECURITY COMPANY - As
·
LYLE
SCHLIEDER APPOINTED TO CZ BOARD FOR 1-YEAR TERM-
O
·
PROPOSALS
TO BAN CZ BOD AND DISTRICT DELEGATE SEATS &
CUMULATIVE VOTING - UPDATE -
SATIRE
– a brief
Satire -
There is a large body of work establishing the use of
effective political satire.
Experts posit that the best satire is one where
the reader is unable to distinguish fact from fiction.
For example:
God's
Wrath
Claim: Pat
Robertson said that Hurricane Katrina was caused by
God's anger over the selection of lesbian comedienne
Ellen Degeneres to host the upcoming Emmy Awards.
Status: False.
Example: [Dateline Hollywood,
2005]
|
ROBERTSON BLAMES HURRICANE ON CHOICE OF ELLEN DEGENERES TO HOST
EMMYS
Lesbian is New Orleans native
Hollywood — Pat Robertson on Sunday said
that Hurricane Katrina was God's way of
expressing its anger at the Academy of
Television Arts and Sciences for its selection
of Ellen Degeneres to host this year's Emmy
Awards. "By choosing an avowed lesbian
for this national event, these Hollywood
elites have clearly invited God's wrath,"
Robertson said on "The 700 Club" on
Sunday. "Is it any surprise that the
Almighty chose to strike at Miss Degeneres’
hometown?"
Robertson also noted that the last time
Degeneres hosted the Emmys, in 2001, the
September 11 terrorism attacks took place
shortly before the ceremony.
[Rest of article here.]
|
Origins: Good satire neatly
straddles the divide between the believable and the
incredible, and the Dateline Hollywood article
quoted above achieved that balance so well that many
readers mistook it for a straight news article. This
acceptance was due in large part to U.S. evangelist
Pat Robertson's history of making rather outrageous
public statements
on his 700 Club television program, including
his recent call for the assassination
of Venezuelan President Hugo
Chavez.
The satirical premise expressed in the original piece,
that Mr. Robertson might make a connection between
homosexuality and hurricanes, doesn't even require
stretching the truth. During a 6 August 1998 broadcast
of The 700 Club, Mr. Robertson addressed
comments at participants of the Orlando, Florida, Gay
Pride Festival, stating: "I would warn Orlando
that you're right in the way of some serious
hurricanes, and I don't think I'd be waving those
flags in God's face if I were you."
Those not quite convinced that the Dateline
Hollywood article really was intended as satire
are invited to read that web publication's explanation
of their history,
starting with their founding in 360 BC as Gladiators
Weekly. Source:
Snopes.Com
Although experts argue that more effective use of political satire
is when the reader is not able to tell truth from
fiction, the CotoBuzz satire is more user friendly –
we make sure that anyone with a sixth grade education
is able to tell the difference.
If you have note visited the Coto Discussion
Forum home page:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CotoBuzz/
- following is copy of the welcome message:
| Welcome
to CotoBuzz. Our Mission is to fight resident
apathy one resident at a time through
community journalism and satire. “The best
satire does not seek to harm or damage by its
ridicule, unless we speak of damage structure
of vice, but rather seek to create a shock of
recognition and to make vice repulsive so that
the vice will be expunged from the person or
society under attack or from the person or
society intended to benefit from the attack
(regardless of who is the immediate object of
attack); whenever possible this shock of
recognition is to be conveyed through laughter
or wit: The formula of satire is one of honey
and medicine. Far from being simply
destructive, satire is implicitly
constructive” (Harris, 1990). Our brand of
satire is anchored by a CotoLady, a Puppy
Cocker Spaniel,CotoLady and Community
Journalism, (patterned after the one promoted
by The Nieman Foundation for Journalism at
Harvard University, Nieman Watchdog) covering
the Canyons & Environs. |
Why
do you suppose that even though we are district
delegates and have legitimate questions as to whether
the BOD follows the
Business
Judgment Rule and other issues, yet Keystone and the
BOD refuse to provide us with ANY information
or respond to ANY of our questions?
{for
complete Yahoo article:
http://loan.yahoo.com/m/primer13.html}
1.
"We Can't Wait to Get Our Hands
on Your Money -- Or Even Your Home."
A gardening violation. That's what
landed Jeffrey DeMarco in hot water with his Rancho
Santa Fe, Calif., homeowners association a few years
ago:
2. "We're More Secretive Than the
CIA."
Like corporate boards, which have a fiduciary
responsibility to make disclosures to shareholders, a
homeowners association board is supposed to be upfront
with its members.
3. "When in Doubt, We Sue."
Board members will tell you that the last thing they
want is to go to court. But it happens all the time.
Experts estimate that in California, 75% of the
homeowners associations are embroiled in a legal
tangle of some kind.
4. "You Won't Be Able to Sell
When You Want."
Besides being expensive, lawsuits often mean that you
won't be able to sell your home when the time comes to
move. "Would you want to go out and buy a
property that was in the middle of a lawsuit?"
5. "We're Poorer Than We
Look."
Every association has a reserve fund. It's like a
savings account, and it's meant to be tapped when
things go wrong or the property falls into disrepair.
But often these funds are in terrible shape
themselves.
6. "We Can Make Up the Rules as
We Go Along."
"Even
if you were to be given the rules today, they're
probably already out of date because [boards are]
constantly making changes to the rules at whim,"
7. "We Don't Want You at Our
Meetings."
Even when you can attend, the board
may not acknowledge you. "Board members won't
come out and say that they don't want you at their
meetings,"
8. "We're in Over Our
Heads."
Most board members are volunteers, and they generally
get their training on the job. Sometimes their
inexperience means they bungle the bookkeeping,
resulting in higher fees or assessments.
9. "We Work for Nothing but Get
Compensated in Other Ways."
Being on the board is a thankless job, board members
will tell you. That's probably true much of the time.
But strictly speaking, it's not always so. The thanks
they often get may surprise you.
10. "We're Incredibly
Petty."
In many associations being hard-nosed about the rules
is practically the board's raison d'etre.
"Some of these board members have nothing better
to do. So instead of taking care of the property, they
censor people's lifestyles," says Vicki Satern of
Common Ownership Alliance.
1. The Association is unaware of its own responsibilities as stated in
the governing documents. Research the association
governing documents to see what is typically
authorized in the documents.
a. What
specific maintenance responsibilities does the
Association have for common elements, easements, or
the lots owned by the members?
b. What
rules and regulations does the Association have the
authority to publish concerning the governance of the
common areas (for instance, pool rules)?
2.
The Association is not in compliance with its own rules or
responsibilities as stated in the governing documents.
.
For instance, is the common area of the
Association being maintained at the same standards
imposed on the members?
a.
Has the board established and
communicated those standards to the management
company, members, and vendors who may be responsible
for maintaining those standards?
3.
There is selected enforcement of the governing documents. Most documents provide that the board shall have the right to
interpret the provisions of the governing documents
and to establish clarification on terms such as:
.
"reasonable"
a.
"use a reasonably high standard of
care"
b.
"substantially detract"
c.
"public or private nuisance"
4.
Inconsistency exists as to when noncompliance notices are sent out
and what follow through action is implemented to
remedy the noncompliance. Take the time to create a covenants compliance process that can be
implemented to address:
.
Sequence of the notifications
a.
Tone and content of the noncompliance
notices
b.
Fine system procedures
c.
Appeal and hearing process
d.
Legal action
5.
Design Guidelines are not established to create consistency in the
architectural review process and decisions. Design
guidelines set the standard for the community and
establish critical criteria for common homeowner
projects (paint colors, landscape material, exterior
ornamentation). By creating these standards before the
first homeowner moves in, it is easier to pursue
architectural prohibitions up front.
6.
Inspections are not conducted as scheduled or so infrequently that
the violations are not being handled on a timely
basis. When establishing the covenants compliance process, take a tour
around the community and get a sense of what needs to
be inspected, how long the site inspections will take,
and based on that review establish the frequency of
the inspections. In addition, put the inspections of
the common elements on a regular schedule.
7.
Inspections are usually conducted at the same time, same day each
time. Try staggering the days or conducting the site tours at hours
outside the normal operating times to observe
different situations. For instance, if street parking
is an issue, it may be a good idea to approach that
task on weekends or at nights to catch those
violations when they most frequently occur.
8.
Recurring noncompliance problems are not remedied, causing the issue
to continue over time from one board to another board. Address these issues head on with the board members and gain
closure on the issues. Allowing the problems to spread
out over time only makes it harder to enforce new
violations that are discovered.
9.
The Board establishes rules and regulations but fails to communicate
the policies to the member. Always send out the
final approved document to the members and have any
new documents available for member meetings.
The noncompliance process is
not updated on a timely basis. Are there annual reviews of all the governing documents, rules and
regulations? How about soliciting the help of member
volunteers to review the process for noncompliance and
seek input from the membership?
2006
CZ Objectives
Given
that CotoBuzz has called exactly three consecutive CZ
elections weeks before they actually take place, and
since we have not received any feedback on our
recommendations for the CZ 2006 Objectives, we figure
we try our hand at forecasting the top 10 official CZ
Objectives as follow:
1.
CZensorship
2.
Fashion and Demeanor
3.
CZensorship
4.
Saturday Walks
5.
CZensorship
6.
Service Provider Not for Excellence Award
7.
CZensorship
8.
Consultant of the Year Award
9.
CZensorship
10.
CitiHood
AOL
USERS
Because
AOL has changed some of its spam filters, AOL may be
inadvertently preventing the delivery of CotoBuzz to
some of its readers. Please forward this
newsletter to your AOL friends and ask them to check
their spam filters and contact AOL if necessary.
COTOBUZZ
VISION - Fighting Coto Resident Apathy One Resident At
a Time!
COTOBUZZ
is a change
agent to transform the historically confrontational,
antagonistic Coto culture by maximizing resident
involvement and facilitating communication between the
board, residents and service providers, and eventually
develop a sense of community and civic pride
while maintaining the Coto Life Style we all have come
to love.
Forward
this newsletter to your Coto friends and neighbors. Ask
them to sign up for their own copy (free) at www.cotobuzz.com
You are receiving this newsletter because
you have confirmed your subscription at www.cotobuzz.com,
you are a CZ Master Association delegate, service
provider or interested party. To cancel your
subscription, contact:
The
views of collaborators, service providers or invited
guests do not necessarily reflect those of CotoBuzz
For
advertising in the CotoBuzz newsletter details, click
here:
Terms
of Use
|
Coto
Discussion Forum Alive and Thriving
|
|
Currently, the
forum can be accessed by the CZ Board, residents from the
Estates, Villages and CZ Masters. Subjects covered
include CZ Board of Directors Performance, or lack
thereof, CZensorship, PerCZeption is Knowledge, the Dead Oak Trees, Cumulative Voting, the Brewing
Revolt, Security, etc..... Get your Swiss Knife (the
right tool for the right job) -
join the Coto Discussion Forum
When
participants violate the Cotobuzz guidelines, they will be
BUZZED three times. The
third BUZZ will come along with an automatic ban from the
discussion forum for a period of one month.
We
suggest you obtain a free email account such as Yahoo or
Hotmail. Since you can post and download pictures
and files, we also recommend you have you antivirus
software updated. If you need help setting up, send
us email at cotobuzz@yahoo.com
CotoBuzz is
open to all Coto de Caza residents, regardless of
political affiliation, personal or professional agenda.
Mutual respect – we may not agree, but we recognize
we all have a right to express ourselves without fear of
retribution. We express ourselves without resorting to
personal abuse or name-calling.
|
|
|
|