|
The
DeVore-Spitzer Debate & the One Million Dollar OC Man
Posted By CotoBlogzz
May 13, 2011
Rancho
Santa Margarita, CA – If you
think gas prices are exorbitant, have you seen how much it takes to
get a candidate elected to the Orange County Board of Supervisors (OCBOS)?
Looking
at the open seat in the Orange County Third District as an investment,
under what conditions would you buy stock at some 1000 price to
earnings (P/E) ratio? Consider
that brand-centric companies usually command a 10-30 multiple, whereas
financial-centric ones usually go for 1-5 times. Now, Hot
Market-Centric Companies
Such
as the ones listed below, did not get over a 500 times multiple:
Company
PE
Market Cap
1.
AOL
253
$109.4B
2.
Yahoo
311
$39.6B
3.
Excite
491
$7.3B
4.
Amazon
-119
$20.2B
Further,
according to Forbes, Quarter Ending Date 2011/03 results for Apple
Computer, show the following price to earnings ratios:
Then
consider that just this week, a
study by Millward Brown a global brands agency found that thanks to
the iPhone and iPad Apple, is now worth $153 Billion
 |
|
 |
|
Chuck DeVore |
|
Todd Spitzer |
According
to an email blast from Third candidate Chuck DeVore, his likely opponent Todd
Spitzer “….has a million dollars – money from government unions
and special interests,” adding that “with a million dollars, my
opponent’s consultant can pump out thousands and thousands of slick
mailers attacking me with all kinds of false charges – I know,
because my opponent’s consultant was the same consultant my defeated
2004 opponent “
So
what is the P/E ratio for
the Third District? Roughly
close to infinity. Why?
Because in this case the E is not
earnings, as much as it is entitlements.
That is, a taxpayer pays for the price and for the
entitlement!
We
have been trying to get Mr. DeVore and Mr. Spitzer to have a
substantive debate on the issues the county of Orange faces, but to
date Mr. Spitzer has been unresponsive and Mr. DeVore’s responses
have lacked substance. While
we have suggested certain bold initiatives, Mr. DeVore has largely
responded with reasons why the proposals are not doable – not with
his own bold proposals:
A.
Audits – We are
calling for an audit of the OCSD. The
county apparently does not have the necessary tools. The
state is supposed to conduct audits to make sure everything is in the
up and up. However, no county or state agency contacted so
far has records of any audits performed. Further, law
enforcement officials and Governor Brown are
asking for a tax increase. Does it make sense to have a tax
increase when we cannot trace how the public safety dollar is being
managed? Mr. DeVore
says that “.. the county has the authority to order its own
audits, and it should.” The
problem with such a response is analogous to having the fox audit the
hen house.
Stephen
Connelly, OCSD’s Executive
Director of Independent Review, for
example, when asked about department accountability, he said “Accountability
means different things to different people”. Further, Mr.
Connely was aware of tools and or metrics used by management in the
department to make sure there was some sort of accountability.
And a just-released-OCSD follow-up to a 2008 audit criticizing
the OCSD for allowing out-of-control, “ because
the department lacked sufficient rules and controls “
misses the mark: The new audit credits new overtime
rules with a drop in overtime costs of $21.6
million.. We have asked to county to clarify the
rationale used to reach such conclusion, as the evidence indicates the
reason is "because
the department lacked the proper management"
Then
there is the issue of an outdated manual timecard system, which needs
to be overhauled, and according to Sheriff’s Executive
Director Rick Dostal. A new system could save the county as much
as $225,000 a
year. We are also asking the county to clarify.
After all, most reputable payroll processing services provide
timecard systems for free. Worse
case, there are plenty of open source solutions at no cost to the
county.
B.
BRCI
- We
are asking Third candidates to consider an Orange County bureau
realignment and closure initiative, whereby 80% of the bureaucracies
should either close or merge – initiative patterned after the
military closure initiative. If successful, the notion can
be a prototype that can be exported to other counties and the nation.
No real response from Mr. DeVore
On
a related note, Mr. DeVore’s email blast refers to “…an independent
poll taken in March shows
me beating my opponent, Todd Spitzer, by 39 percent to 25 percent.”
Our proprietary Poldex© Index, a measure of relative
popularity in the county, places Mr. DeVore at a major disadvantage
with only 15%
While
it may be understandable that a substantive debate may be too early,
given a one million dollar war chest that can be used for demagoguery,
voters deserve better. Particularly
when the P/E ratio approximates infinity.
###
RELATED
STORIES
DeVore
on ANDRES BOCELI - Rancho
Santa Margarita, CA- Candidate
Obama rightfully demanded that words must mean something.
President Obamaregularly
parses words not
unlike the infamous "it all depends on what is is".
Politicians regularly use the terms accountability and transparency,
but when pressed as to what they are ready to do, they deflect, deny
or ignore, perhaps even lie - that is, the political game of DIDL.
California's
Triple Threat - Rancho Santa
Margarita, CA - We
assert that the sucking sound you hear are all the jobs California is
losing to Nevada, Texas and Utah, in large measure do to what we refer
to as California's
Triple Threat: 1) Public
sector organized labor, 2)
un-elected,
un-checked parasitic bureaucracies and
3) lobbyists.
Economic
Freedom and the Triple Constraint
- Rancho Santa
Margarita, CA -
The Heritage Foundation & The Wall Street Journal compared 183
countries across ten
specific freedoms such
as trade freedom, business freedom, property rights, investment
freedom and others, to come up with the so called The Link
Between Economic Opportunity and Prosperity: The
2009 Index of Economic Freedom. Such index ranked
Hong Kong at the top, while the United States was relegated to the
number six slot
A
view of Senator Obama Using a Disgruntled Homeowner Prism
During a recent
blogging exchange with Assemblyman
Todd Spitzer , he referred to a particular constituent as a
disgruntled member of a homeowners association. Now,
we have heard the term disgruntled employee regularly in
employer-employee spats and usually in whistle blowing scenarios. We
have also hear the term disgruntled resident in the context of an
argument between representatives of a homeowners’ association and
the resident itself. Never
from a politician to characterize a constituent.
A Winning
the Future Moment, or Simply: WTF?
- Rancho Santa
Margarita, CA – President
Obama has ditched the car in the ditch metaphor and the Hope &
Change slogan in lieu of taking the engine off of an airplane metaphor
and Winning the
Future slogan
. Critics say
that the new metaphor does not work, since the airplane is heading to
China to mortgage future generations of American, when the airplane
has no fuel, while Governor Sarah Palin characterizes the new
slogan as “What Were They Thinking” (WWTT)
or in the vernacular: WTF?
The
2010 Union Voting Guide - Use at your Own Peril
- Rancho Santa
Margarita, CA -
There is a lot of truth in the old adage that "we should not
judge a book by its cover." But what if we have access to the
Cover, the Table of Contents and the Appendix? Can we get a good idea
as to the contents of the book? In other words, using another adage
"tell me who you associate with and I will tell you who you
are?" and applying the latter to political elections, if we know
the candidate's supporters, we should be able to have a good idea
about how that candidate will govern. Take for instance Van Jones,
Reverend Wright, the National Representative of the Nation of Islam's Louis
Farrakhan, the Reverend Al Sharpton, terrorist William Charles
" Bill" Ayers and former White House Chief of Staff Rahm
Emanuel all supporters of candidate Obama. Should this not have
been a good indicator, largely ignored, of the contents of the now
Presidential Book?
THE
FORUM: Vote "Yes" for 23; support jobs
The California Air
Resources Board acknowledges that "no direct public health
impacts" are expected from Prop 23. The proposition delays
control of greenhouse gas emissions, implicated in global warming. It
delays implementation of AB 32 (the global warming solution), which
penalizes sources of emissions, especially refineries and fossil fuel
power sources.
The
2010 Union Voting Guide - Use at your Own Peril
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA - There is a lot of truth in the old adage
that "we should not judge a book by its cover." But what if
we have access to the Cover, the Table of Contents and the Appendix?
Can we get a good idea as to the contents of the book? In other words,
using another adage "tell me who you associate with and I will
tell you who you are?" and applying the latter to political
elections, if we know the candidate's supporters, we should be able to
have a good idea about how that candidate will govern. Take for
instance Van Jones, Reverend Wright, the National Representative of
the Nation of Islam's Louis Farrakhan, the Reverend Al Sharpton,
terrorist William Charles " Bill" Ayers and former White
House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel all supporters of candidate Obama.
Should this not have been a good indicator, largely ignored, of the
contents of the now Presidential Book?
2010
California Propositions Voters Guide
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA - While heuristics indicate that a NO vote
in any California's direct special interest democracy is a wise move,
following the money may be even better. Below is a list of the 2010
California propositions, their main supporters and our
recommendations, including a brief rationale.
|
BOTH USELESS
I'm sick of both of these guys and with good reasons, plural, too numerous to list here. Every politician, now especially a Republican politician says whatever they think other constituents want to hear. You nailed it Buzz, HE DID NOTHING. NADA. NOTHING. Which is what most of them do: NOTHING. They want the perks of the job, the limelight,
Meanwhile the constituents are left to fend for themselves, how is this any better than what Obama is doing: NOTHING.
Both these men have had chance after chance TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE in their districts and they have been pedestrian in their attainment and marginal in their so-called successes (which really are no successes at all) . We are sick and tired of promises. We need some damn ACTION. Stop blaming the legislative gridlock, its a cop out. We want JOBS. We want to get rid of NAFTA. We want our local agriculture businesses to be given some breaks so we can buy and sell local produce. We want reduction in utility rates. We want lower taxes. And the list goes on.
It really doesn't matter what the list is, because once either of these two get in, they put their feet up on the desk just like all the rest of them and start collecting their paychecks. I CAN TELL YOU THIS: NEITHER OF THEM HAVE ANSWERED MY TELEPHONE CALLS. BOTH of them have palmed me and other callers off to stupid IQ-less "aids." And we all know who the "aids" are, people who donated to the campaign, its THEIR KID. Useless.
YES it is absolutely true, one must know a lobbyist to get close to either of these gentlemen, after all, they're just looking for a job aren't they. WHERE ARE THE JOBS IN YOUR DISTRICT FOR THE REST OF US?.