|
February 2010
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Baughing to the King & the 2010 OCSD RaceRancho Santa
Margarita, CA - The President of the United States
caused quite a controversy when he bowed to kings and
foreign dignitaries to the point that the White House
spokesperson had to refer to the old Clintonian, “it
depends on what is, is” to explain that while the
president was bowing, he really was not bowing.
1. The
Chief Bratton Model: Go to bat for everything
the union bosses want, then leave when the money dries
up. Most effective when the leader has a PR
machine that can rival his or her bosses. This
model was extremely successful in NYC and Los Angeles
all due to Chief Bratton. We previously suggested
Chief Bratton left a bankrupt Los Angeles, certain
skeletons would show up. Indeed, the ink was not
dried in Chief Bratton’s exit documents when an
audit revealed that the LAPD
Botched Millions in Purchases. 2. Then
there is what we call the Obamelette Omelette
Progressive Model. In this case, the public
sector’s organized labor is THE agenda enforced via
Andy Stern’s motto of “power of persuasion or
persuasion of power” 3. The
more fiscal conservative mode is the The
Ronald Reagan Model
– Shape up or ship out: “…we cannot compare
labor-management relations in the private sector with
government” in other words, organized labor in the
public sector should be obsolete in the 21st
century. 4. And
recently we saw a unique working relationship between
Scott Brown, an elected official and organized labor,
where rank and file is more in line with the elected
official than the union bosses: The Brown
Model: A hybrid where the union bosses are
taken out of the picture and instead deal directly
with rank and file to take care of he taxpayers
agenda. Now, consider the Baugh Initiative - the initiative in essence asks candidates to make a choice as to who the candidates are going to bow: The party agenda or the union’s. If the party, the candidates may very well be endorsed by the party As of this writing we do not know how the Baugh Initiative relates to the other models: perhaps a hybrid? We
also do not know if the Baugh initiative is intended
to do more than just make sure the party is endorsing
candidates with similar priorities. We have asked
Scott a number of questions to help us see the light,
but we have not heard from him. Make no mistake about it. While Orange County cannot support any of the models described above, for obvious reasons, the Baugh Initiative is a game changer, particularly in the 2010 Orange County Sheriff’s race.
The
Cotobuzz Journals’ Poldex is non-partisan,
heuristics-based indicator
associated with relative name-recognition.
Over the years it has proven to be very
reliable with few surprises, with the possible
exception of the 2010 OC Sheriff Department campaign:
Poldex© Index scores Sheriff Hutchens as 3%
with a rapidly ascending Chief Hunter at 40% and Lt.
Hunt at 100%
"These would be tangible hard dollar savings that could be better used to enhance the quality of life in our communities without jeopardizing public safety. Because Mrs. Hutchens only limitedly followed up on my correctional officer plan,
– after all, the union bosses have and will continue to have, regardless of who the new Sheriff is, supermajority on this most important subject. For the moment, the question remains: Who will the OC Sheriff candidates bow to? The party? The Union? What about the taxpayers - after all, is this not what the Tea Bag Party Movement is all about?
On the other hand, the Baugh Initiative will for sure galvanize the electorate as noted above: What is more important? The party's agenda or the union's? I posit that there is at least a third choice: 3) the taxpayers agenda. After all the latter is what the Tea Bag Party Movement is all about! The old adage that you cannot serve two masters rings true. However, what about three or four masters? Say the union bosses, the taxpayers, the managers and or the elected officials. A practical example: City council members sign a "contract" with the OCBOS for OCSD services, usually in the millions of dollars/year. The state is supposed to conduct audits to make sure the cities are getting what the taxpayers are paying for. Guess how many audits the state has conducted? Further, there is absolutely no way the city managers can tell whether the services they are buying are actually being delivered. That is, agents can show up to work or not, and only their direct supervisors will know - maybe. Since the OCSD does not keep these and other records (per PRA requests) for accountability purposes and the cities are not demanding them, trusting the state will do its job, no one really knows whether the taxpayer money is being spent on the right issues. Heck, the OCSD does not even know how many cases it sends to the OCDA's office nor how many cases the OCSDA rejects - BTW, 30% for OCSD forensics and 20% for OCSD - the highest of 100 LE agencies submitting cases to the OCDA! In contrast, ask the SAPD the same question and it will not only tell you, but it has one of the lowest reject rates! More troubling however is that the OCSD OIR cannot define accountability and it has not associated metrics. Do you suppose labor bosses would ever agree to setting up metrics so they can be held accountable? A more likely response is what Sheriff Anderson got when he proposed his plan for jail management, for instance. It is not about reform as much as it is competent civil servants and for the union bosses to accept responsibility for the culture of the department. - Buzz Deputies Union President Thug or Not, You Decide The Orange County deputies’ union membership perform an honorable service in our community but so do our school teachers and postal workers. It’s not the line staff members of the public unions that are our society’s problem but their leadership. For example, the Orange County deputies’ union president Wayne Quint has repeatedly practiced bully politics when he fears his dues paying membership numbers could be at risk. Make no mistake about it, the elected union president is out to get his members more pay or retain what they have amassed at the taxpayers’ expense. More
blatant examples of the deputies’ union
president’s bully politicking include threatening to
get involved in the City of Newport Beach politics if
they support taking over the Sheriff’s
Department’s responsibility for patrolling Newport
Beach harbor. A 2007 OCR
article
titled. “Newport
bay patrol spurs tough talk”;
“Steve Rosansky
(Newport Beach Mayor) says Quint asked him to disavow
interest in the harbor patrol or the [Deputies’]
association would get involved in city elections.
"I believe they were there to kind of threaten
and intimidate me" and the City Council, Rosansky
said. Quint doesn't dispute the substance of the
conversation but denies bullying the mayor.
"Educating the public is not a threat,"
Quint said.” There
was the deputies’ union bosses’ not so veiled
threat to conduct a vote of no confidence on then
Acting Sheriff Jack Anderson when he announced a plan
to replace deputy sheriffs in the jails with
correctional officers at about half the cost. See the
OCR’s Total Buzz 2008 titled Union
to block Anderson’s jail staffing plan.
Anderson continued to move the plan forward
until a new sheriff was selected. Under pressure
to save money, appointed Sheriff Sandra Hutchens
partially implemented Anderson’s plan by limitedly
negotiating with the deputies’ union to only install
35 percent correctional officers in the county jails. This
month, the OCR reveals in an article titled, “Deputies
spend $105,000 in recall election,”
in the City of Mission Viejo. Over 9,300 city
residents registered to vote signed a petition to put
the question of recalling a councilman on the February
2nd ballot. Now the deputies’ union
president Wayne Quint is quoted saying, “We
see this as an abuse of the electoral system and that
is why we're opposed to this." Quint has spent
twice as much union dollars to oppose the recall then
the three involved candidates combined expenditures.
It is still unclear what Quint hopes to buy with his
member’s dues but we can all be assured Quint has
some plan for it will be paid for with taxpayer
dollars. This year’s Sheriff’s race should prove to be exciting, with candidates Private Investigator Bill Hunt and appointed Sheriff Sandra Hutchens willingness to accept public employee union money and a single candidate, Deputy Chief Craig Hunter, standing on a principled governance platform. I believe we can expect the electorate to respond similarly to Massachusetts’ voters. OC COMMON SENSE Candidate Obama loved to say that Words Must Mean Something. Now President Obama says that Words Don't Mean Jack.
Accountability seems to be one of those words that change meaning, particularly when ti comes to the OC elected officials. The OCSD OIR review will tell you that "accountability means different things to different people" in the deparment. Furhter, he lacks metrics to determine whether the departement is doing an effective job or not. The point is candidates love the word "accountability" yet offer nothing in terms of yardstick to measured them against with corresponding consequences. Again, just look at the Congress and the US administration. By listening to the SOUA, you would say that the president has kept al his campaign promises, and where he is lacking, simply place blame on someone else. This has to stop - this is what the Tea Bag Party Movement is trying to do. Hold officials accountable. To be clear, public servants do indeed perform an honorable and required job - The union bosses work against the taxpayer with few exceptions. However, I am with President Ronald Reagan in this one. Organized labor in the public sector should be outlawed in the 21st century: Look at the national Jobs market. The government is the largest employer in the nation. The government's payroll has had the largest pay increase. How many jobs has the government created? It depends on whether you use you use VP Biden's "funny math" - what we call the Imaginary J-Numbers. We do agree that the Baugh Initiative has galvanized the campaign - and of this reason alone, it will be a game changer - Buzz Good article Coto! Really interesting read. I commend your sleuthing and tenacity. You're doing what the other papers SHOULD be doing. Did you ever think that the unions might be part of the problem(s)? I take issue with the Baugh initiative because it is basically meaningless, ie, it really doesn't matter what these candidates state up front anymore, as we learned with Barack Hussein Obama II's campaign: he signaled right and turned left, off a cliff. Furthermore, the candidates in general will say anything and then when they are in office do something else. HOW do we know who's telling the truth anymore? HOW do we, the public know who we can and cannot trust anymore. Just like you state regarding the audits. To me that is scandalous! Those audits should be published in the local newspapers. Someone should propose that as a law. Someone needs to investigate RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT. Sherman Tank Never Underestimate Corruption What we "expect" and what "happens" are two entirely different things. eg, people "expected" Obama would be a decent, fair, lawabiding president, what "happened" is now history. There are more members than there are "Union" bosses. No different than the homeowner association types of environments that Mr. Cotobuzz discusses in his many writings, so too, the same equation exists here: REBEL. Again, there are more members than Union bosses. If you expect the "same" thing that happened in Mass. to happen here, you/they must be better organized and rabid. Sheriff Sandra Hutchens IMHO cannot be trusted and I've not decided yet on the veracity of Bill Hunt -- I am not alone. I do not trust the Unions in California, they are corrupt, corruptible, corrupted. For
HUNTER to win, he must do MORE and MORE OF IT
-- sort of like what Brown did in Mass. but in L.A. he
must at minimum quadruple those efforts or he will be
undermined. It is no longer enough to be a
"good guy."- SHERMAN TANK Tank: In covering Lt. Hunt, I agree that he is a viable candidate. He is not only articulate, but seems to know in great detail what it takes to hold people accountable - and he does know where the skeletons' are buried. You are right however - the question is whether he can forge a working relationship with the union bosses which will allow him to change the culture. After all, as noted before, the Union Is the Culture AND provide the taxpayer an acceptable return on his "public safety" dollar. We have tried to do a follow up interview with him to see if he can shed some light on the subject.
RELATED STORIES Does
the new OC Sheriff Know Jack about Tech? The
Sheriff Comes to Town ? Is She, or Isn?t She? We do
not know ? she won?t say! New
OC Sheriff to Host 4th Cruise for Make A Wish
Foundation OCSD
Competitiveness as Public Safety Supplier and US
Competitiveness in Global Markets.
Gas
Prices Up, Accidents in Coto Down - An Accident? In
Search of D-WOP Loopholes Attorney
and Accountant Indicted in Largest Medical Insurance
Fraud Case in the Nation The
Orange County Sheriffs Department unveils the Avoid
the Ten? DUI CampaignX Former
Haidl, Jaramillo Defense Attorney JG Cavallo Goes to
Jail CHP
Officer Arrested, Held on $4 million Bail at the
Orange County Jail. Coto
de Caza DUI Collision Lawsuit Notes Coto
de Caza DUI Collision (Skendarian) Lawsuit Settlement Call
911 to Report DUIs - ?Avoid the Ten? Holiday DUI
Crackdown in South Orange County- "Law
enforcement can only do so much" - Loopholes, the OCWWF and the next OCSD You cannot be part of the solution when you have been part of the problem, as in Lt Hunt. The Spin Machines for Hutchens and Walters for OC Sheriff are full throttle trying to persuade the Orange County Board of Supervisors that their gal or guy is the right person for the job. So much dirt is flowing in both directions putting SUV commercials to shame. Then, there are the Lt. Hunt supporters doing a Hilary impersonation tying to get their guy the number two spot, or any spot for that matter, in the new OCSD. Star
Search – for the OCSD – The Final Episode
SetAlthough
the process used by the Orange County Board of
Supervisors to winnow down the number of candidates to
replace much maligned OC Sheriff Michael Carona was at
best flawed, the final two candidates represent not
necessarily the best of the field, but not necessarily
the worst, either. The
OCSD Culture Thing – It is not my Job!
- The
leading OC Sheriff candidates agree that the OC
Sheriff’s Department needs an organizational culture
makeover, the OC District Attorney finds the current
OCSD’s culture lacking, the Orange County Board of
Supervisors demand changes to the OC Sheriff’s
Department’s organizational culture, and the
President of the Association of Orange County Deputy
Sheriff’s Wayne Quint agree that a culture change is
required. OCSD Insiders Make Paper Cut - How? We do not know We understand that a "paper cut" has been performed by Bob Murray and Associates, the talent search firm being used to hire the next OC Sheriff. We have contacted a number of the cut candidates - apparently, they did not know they were no longer viable candidates. Working
to Serve or Serving to Work? - AOCDS Fundraiser Working
to Serve, Or Serving To Work - Letter to OC Register
Columnist The
Coto de Caza Board of Directors to Help Hire the new
OC Sheriff? The
Three OC Blind Mice The
OCSD Fox Guarding the Hen OC
Board of Supervisors Full Of Sound and Fury,
Signifying Nothing! Public
Safety Owners and Orphans A
Chat with OC Sheriff Candidates - Coto de Caza's Own
Ralph Martin OC
Sheriff personnel not criminally liable in death of
Chamberlain- OCDA Winter
Cleaning at the OCSD Continues A
Chat with OC Sheriff Department Candidate: Craig
Hunter A
Chat with OC Sheriff Candidates: Kevin Keyes
|
ADVERTISEMENT
|
To subscribe/unsubscribe to the CotoBuzz Journal or send
Letters to the Editor
The CotoBuzz Journal P.O. Box 154 Trabuco Canyon, CA 92678 (509) 355-8895
Privacy Policy | Need Help? | Contact Us | Administrator: cotobuzz@yahoo.com