|
March 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Back-of-the-Check Contract - Only in a Common Interest Development (CID)
Posed By CotoBlogzz 02-19-2010 Agoura
Hills, CA - Recently
the property manager sent Mr. Gerstel a note on behalf
of the board, alerting him that a
”check in the amount of $280.00 has been
sent via FedEx to your home. It should be
delivered tomorrow morning. Your delivery
signature is required for the envelope.”
Mr. Gerstel tells us that on February 18,
2009 he indeed received
a check with a little apparently innocuous surprise: on the back of the check, the following note appeared: “We
would like the stub to reflect that it is payment in
full satisfaction of all claims made in Small Claims
Case No. LA V09V07093 for not timely producing
although provided to Gerstel the providing -Member
List, _Architectural Committee Minutes -Unredacted
Board of Director Minutes from 1998 through 2009
-Board of Director Minutes from 1990 through 1997 -Fountainwood
Hillside Failure Documents -June 10,2009 Meeting and
Confer Minutes – Current Contracts, Salaries to
vendors, Emplyees, Contractors, Purchase Orders,
Credit Card Statements, Reimbursment Requests for
Board Members.” It
would be an understatement to say that Mr.
Gerstel was less than satisfied with the
back-of-the-check contract:
“ By
accepting that check I would be agreeing to the
Board’s modification of the judges decision”
he said, then added. “This is a very
unethical tactic and I believe it is another move by
the Board’s attorneys to try and include all
violations of the law by the Board in a case that only
pertains to one issue… the laundry list of
other violations the Board describes in their release
were not litigated and cannot be included in this
judgment.”
This
back-of-the-check maneuver action reminds us of LA
Times columnist and author D. Vanitzian
comments when we asked her about the Morrison Ranch
Estates' HOA board's actions anent Business Judgment: “ How is it in the best interest of the
association to appeal a small claims actions against a
resident who has prevailed. How does that show good
faith.” - The business judgment rule
provides protection form liability for breaches
of fiduciary duty for directors and officers who act
in the interest of the association, predicated
on good faith. Perhaps a similar question can be
asked in this case:
“ How is it in the best interest of the
association to write a back-of-the-check contract?.
How does that show good faith. Mr.
Gerstel wisely returned the check to the Morrison
State Ranch HOA with a note saying in part: “I do
not agree that this payment is in satisfaction of any
other misconduct by the Board and cannot accept the
check as written. I will only accept a check that
reflects the satisfaction of the one issue ruled on by
the court as stated above. No other issue stated
on the check has been resolved. But
wait, there is more. Recall that we
previously mentioned that complaints in a typical
common interest development adhere to Pareto’s Law
(80-20)? That
is, at least 80 percent of the complaints show up in
most associations.
Take for instance the case of Mr. Ed Caruso in
Coto de Caza.
As the father of a resident, he wanted to know
what was going on in the community and wanted to
attend open session meetings.
But in order to do so, he had to in essence,
sign a Shut
Up rule:
Perhaps
the only good news is like the Tea Baggers,
disgruntled HOA residents have figured out how
to play the game.
RELATED STORIES 15
Minutes Could Save You 15 Year in the Nut Farm To
Recall or No Recall, & The HOA Hall of Shame The
Hen House Guarded by the Fox in Laguna Woods Village's
Foster's Farm & the Hall of Shame - News
This Friday at 2:00 PM Posted
by CotoBlogzz | 06/17/2009 04:00 PM Hoist
By Their Own Petard - Fuses get shorter in Laguna
Woods Village United
Recall Petition Signed Sealed and Delivered - Finance
Committee Meeting United
Board Recall In Final Stretch ? 4th of July in June! Prosecuting
Mr. Curtis - or is it Persecuting? Laguna
Woods Village - United Board on Official Notice The
$5 Million Landscape Budget and Recall Petition How
to recognize a cheater Laguna
Third Mutual's President Queries Answered Laguna
Woods Village Budget Law?
What Law? WE are the Law! Recent find
of Original Documents were mailed to each President
(GRF, Third Laguna Hills Mutual and United Laguna
Hills Mutual), together with information sheets
from OriginalTrust and amendment to the Trust dated
Jan. 9, 1969. These documents stated how and why Ross
Cortese, the developer of Leisure World Laguna Hills,
changed the concept of Leisure World Laguna Hills from
a Senior Citizen non-profit Co- operative to a Senior
Citizen non-profit Condominium Complex. New
Golden Rain Foundation Rules of Engagement Cynthia
Conners Being Asked to Resign
New
Third Laguna Hills Mutual of Laguna Woods Village
Board Seated The
Devil Made me Do It - Blame it on the Loopholes The
Right LWV Leadership for Such a Time as This?
$2
million Verdict Returned Against Homeowners
Association GRF
2009 Budget Review, Be There or Be Out of Luck! Different
Homeowners Association, Same Issues The
Right LWV Leadership for Such a Time as This? Working
to Serve, Or Serving To Work - Letter to OC Register
Columnist To
Destroy a Community, or to Destroy the Status
Quo?XThat is the Question in this Letter to the
Menifee SCCA Board of Directors HOMEOWNER
ASSOCIATION TITLEHOLDERS ARE "HUMAN CAPITAL" HOMEOWNER
ASSOCIATIONS: A CLUB YOU DON'T WANT TO BELONG TO Dare's
role in Pastures cost association $100,000 HIRING
AN ATTORNEY CAN BE HAZARDOUS TO YOUR HEALTH LEGAL BRING
BACK GOVERNOR PETE WILSON Should
I stay or should I go - in/from my HOA? X Casta
Courier Coverage of Unhappy Campers at Leisure World SPENDING
OTHER PEOPLE?S MONEY by Donie Vanitzian, JDX(c) 2007
Vanitzian Critics
do not attend board meetings - GRF that is! The
New Seven, err... Eight Wonders of the World "TWIN
RIVERS" = "TRIPLE PROBLEMS" Lawyer
seeking condominiums' business goes over the line
CONDOMINIUMS
ARE A GREAT INVESTMENT- FOR LAWYERS Paraphrasing
the LA Times on Defeat of SB670 & Wicked Twin
Witches of the West - SB 127 & AB-980 Private
Transfer Tax - Good for the Common Interest
Development (HOA/CID) Industry or Good for the
Politicians? Management
company's tape-recording tactic puts homeowners at
risk Of
Trial Lawyers, the AAJ and the Democratic Party Laguna
Woods Village CC&Rs, What CC&Rs? I Got Your
CC&Rs Right Here! What
is better in HOA Management? Transparency and
Accountability or Feel Good?May 22, 2007 HOW
DO OWNERS SPELL L-A-W S-U-I-T? SENATE BILL NO. 127!X Two
of the Worst & Most Detrimental Laws to Hit
California are Sponsored by None Other than:
California Association of Realtors (R) The Gold is
Gone --No more gold in the Golden State! THE
LAW OF INTENDED CONSEQUENCES - WHAT A DIFFERENCE A
"WORD" MAKES: NO! ON ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 563 EMERGENCY!
EMERGENCY! OOPS! WE JUST HAD THE MEETING! YOU MISSED
IT!! CAN
YOU OUTSWIM YOUR HOA SHARKS? or will you drown trying? HEY
GRAY PANTHERS! YOU GOT IT WRONG! The
Law of Unintended Consequences: Legislation and HOA
BOD Cause and Effect: Clueless in my CAR
Coming off a most improbable but successful campaign
to defeat SB 670 author and HOA advocate Vanitizian
thanks supporters making a connection between the
quality of legislation being passed in Sacramento, and
the quality of life in most homeowners...
|
ADVERTISEMENT
|
To subscribe/unsubscribe to the CotoBuzz Journal or send
Letters to the Editor
The CotoBuzz Journal P.O. Box 154 Trabuco Canyon, CA 92678 (509) 355-8895
Privacy Policy | Need Help? | Contact Us | Administrator: cotobuzz@yahoo.com