|
March 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
COLUMNc)
2001-2007 S.GLASSMAN AND D.VANITZIAN. All rights
reserved. The Associations and Common Interest Living
articles and columns may not be reprinted or
retransmitted in any form without the express written
consent of the copyright holders. The authors take no
position regarding any documents or accompaniments
that may be enclosed with, attached to, or alongside
said article reprints or distribution. Los
Angeles Times, Real Estate Section,
"Associations," February 21, 2010 Board
should set boundaries for its meddlesome attorney Board should set boundaries for its meddlesome attorney One way to deal with legal counsel who shows up on the property unannounced and attends board meetings uninvited is to revise the terms of his agreement. Another is to replace him. By Stephen Glassman and Donie Vanitzian February 21, 2010 QUESTION: Our association' s attorney shows up unannounced and regularly schmoozes on our property with, for example, the new manager, an employee of the association. Uninvited, the attorney attends board meetings, saying, "There's no charge" -- a situation approved by the board president. This attorney creates disputes where none exist and then offers to correct them. Is the attorney trespassing on our common property? Does the board breach its fiduciary duty by allowing him, of his own accord, to conduct business with our employees? What happens if his "free" advice is wrong? ANSWER: The board needs to take control of this situation before it results in association liability. Regardless of whether the attorney has a retainer agreement with the association, the board must instruct him to stop unilateral contact with vendors, such as your manager, and individual board directors. The retainer agreement must make clear when, if at all, the attorney is permitted to contact individual board directors. This would not only curtail the unwanted contacts, it could also save the association money in the long run by avoiding unnecessary expenses. Saying "there's no charge" does not give the attorney an unfettered right to be on the grounds or attend board meetings. Association property is generally private property, and admission is not typically available to the public at large. Unless some specific permission for entry is given, as might be in the case of an attorney employed by the association, presence could be considered trespassing. An attorney is responsible for the advice he gives, whether paid for or not. If the association relies on that advice and that reliance results in damages, then all the remedies available for malpractice or negligence are there for the association to exercise or not as it sees fit. "Schmoozing" could equate to "doing business" with your employees; the attorney then could be interfering with the relationship the association has with those employees, subjecting the attorney to liability. At the very least, he is abusing his relationship with the association. His discussions should be with the board, either during a regular meeting or in executive session, and then only when asked. The association' s management and/or employee contract may have named the manager as its agent, thus authorizing him or her to conduct business on behalf of the association, but that is not the same as the board giving consent to the attorney to discuss its affairs with that employee. The attorney should not be giving advice directly to employees, and any advice given to the board that affects employees must be communicated to those employees by the board, not the attorney. The manager is the association' s agent and as such takes direction from the board. When an association' s attorney inserts himself into the association' s business affairs without consent or request, it could be time to consider finding a new attorney. Send questions to P.O. Box 10490, Marina del Rey, CA 90295 or e-mail noexit@mindspring. com.
RELATED STORIES 15
Minutes Could Save You 15 Year in the Nut Farm To
Recall or No Recall, & The HOA Hall of Shame The
Hen House Guarded by the Fox in Laguna Woods Village's
Foster's Farm & the Hall of Shame - News
This Friday at 2:00 PM Posted
by CotoBlogzz | 06/17/2009 04:00 PM Hoist
By Their Own Petard - Fuses get shorter in Laguna
Woods Village United
Recall Petition Signed Sealed and Delivered - Finance
Committee Meeting United
Board Recall In Final Stretch ? 4th of July in June! Prosecuting
Mr. Curtis - or is it Persecuting? Laguna
Woods Village - United Board on Official Notice The
$5 Million Landscape Budget and Recall Petition How
to recognize a cheater Laguna
Third Mutual's President Queries Answered Laguna
Woods Village Budget Law?
What Law? WE are the Law! Recent find
of Original Documents were mailed to each President
(GRF, Third Laguna Hills Mutual and United Laguna
Hills Mutual), together with information sheets
from OriginalTrust and amendment to the Trust dated
Jan. 9, 1969. These documents stated how and why Ross
Cortese, the developer of Leisure World Laguna Hills,
changed the concept of Leisure World Laguna Hills from
a Senior Citizen non-profit Co- operative to a Senior
Citizen non-profit Condominium Complex. New
Golden Rain Foundation Rules of Engagement Cynthia
Conners Being Asked to Resign
New
Third Laguna Hills Mutual of Laguna Woods Village
Board Seated The
Devil Made me Do It - Blame it on the Loopholes The
Right LWV Leadership for Such a Time as This?
$2
million Verdict Returned Against Homeowners
Association GRF
2009 Budget Review, Be There or Be Out of Luck! Different
Homeowners Association, Same Issues The
Right LWV Leadership for Such a Time as This? Working
to Serve, Or Serving To Work - Letter to OC Register
Columnist To
Destroy a Community, or to Destroy the Status
Quo?XThat is the Question in this Letter to the
Menifee SCCA Board of Directors HOMEOWNER
ASSOCIATION TITLEHOLDERS ARE "HUMAN CAPITAL" HOMEOWNER
ASSOCIATIONS: A CLUB YOU DON'T WANT TO BELONG TO Dare's
role in Pastures cost association $100,000 HIRING
AN ATTORNEY CAN BE HAZARDOUS TO YOUR HEALTH LEGAL BRING
BACK GOVERNOR PETE WILSON Should
I stay or should I go - in/from my HOA? X Casta
Courier Coverage of Unhappy Campers at Leisure World SPENDING
OTHER PEOPLE?S MONEY by Donie Vanitzian, JDX(c) 2007
Vanitzian Critics
do not attend board meetings - GRF that is! The
New Seven, err... Eight Wonders of the World "TWIN
RIVERS" = "TRIPLE PROBLEMS" Lawyer
seeking condominiums' business goes over the line
CONDOMINIUMS
ARE A GREAT INVESTMENT- FOR LAWYERS Paraphrasing
the LA Times on Defeat of SB670 & Wicked Twin
Witches of the West - SB 127 & AB-980 Private
Transfer Tax - Good for the Common Interest
Development (HOA/CID) Industry or Good for the
Politicians? Management
company's tape-recording tactic puts homeowners at
risk Of
Trial Lawyers, the AAJ and the Democratic Party Laguna
Woods Village CC&Rs, What CC&Rs? I Got Your
CC&Rs Right Here! What
is better in HOA Management? Transparency and
Accountability or Feel Good?May 22, 2007 HOW
DO OWNERS SPELL L-A-W S-U-I-T? SENATE BILL NO. 127!X Two
of the Worst & Most Detrimental Laws to Hit
California are Sponsored by None Other than:
California Association of Realtors (R) The Gold is
Gone --No more gold in the Golden State! THE
LAW OF INTENDED CONSEQUENCES - WHAT A DIFFERENCE A
"WORD" MAKES: NO! ON ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 563 EMERGENCY!
EMERGENCY! OOPS! WE JUST HAD THE MEETING! YOU MISSED
IT!! CAN
YOU OUTSWIM YOUR HOA SHARKS? or will you drown trying? HEY
GRAY PANTHERS! YOU GOT IT WRONG! The
Law of Unintended Consequences: Legislation and HOA
BOD Cause and Effect: Clueless in my CAR
Coming off a most improbable but successful campaign
to defeat SB 670 author and HOA advocate Vanitizian
thanks supporters making a connection between the
quality of legislation being passed in Sacramento, and
the quality of life in most homeowners...
|
ADVERTISEMENT
|
To subscribe/unsubscribe to the CotoBuzz Journal or send
Letters to the Editor
The CotoBuzz Journal P.O. Box 154 Trabuco Canyon, CA 92678 (509) 355-8895
Privacy Policy | Need Help? | Contact Us | Administrator: cotobuzz@yahoo.com