|
April 2009 We do not make jokes, we simply watch the LA Times, the Orange County Register and CID/HOA board of directors and report the facts! |
||||||||||
|
Implications
of Restraining Order Against Third Mutual Posted by CotoBlogzz | 3/28,/2009 | 7:00 PM
The Third Mutual board of directors scheduled a special
meeting at 3:30 p.m. Monday to designate directors to
replace the vacancy left by Cynthia Conners,
who was appointed to the City Council on March
18, and a replacement for Ms. McDaniel.
However, according to court documents, the Honorable Frederick
P. Horn approved K. McDaniel’s application for
a temporary restraining order and preliminary
injunction and ordered respondents: MOORE,
SOUSA, CONNERS,
THE THIRD
LAGUNA HILLS MUTUAL, ISABELL
MEUENICHOW, KATHRYN
FRESHLEY and JOHN
PAULUS to
appear before the Orange County Superior Court, April
20, 2009 1:30 PM to show cause, if any.
Hence, Ms. McDanield’s vacant seat remains. The restraining order is intriguing on many levels and
typically characterized as a David and Goliath battle,
given that the establishment, in this case the Third
Mutual has deep pockets in a protracted legal battle -
all it has to do is ask residents for
additional funds.
For this reason, often, the restraining order is issued against
a resident, and not against a board.
Wit the case of a restraining order sought
against 73
year old resident Lou Soken, because “: “This
was an action that was contemplated as a result of
several threatening emails directed to PCM staff
members,” writes Wendy Bucknum
in an email to Laguna Woods residents, in an
apparent attempt to explain why two PCM employees may
feel threatened by the 73 year old resident, and why a
restraining order was necessary. So,
what are the implications of a restraining order
against the Third Mutual board and certain board
members? We
asked various legal eagles, including legal counsel
for the Third Mutual board “It is interesting that
historically most of the restraining orders and
injunctions are usually filed by boards of directors
or homeowner associations and against homeowner(s) who
rarely have enough money to hire counsel to defend
themselves. Here, the very public injunction to
which you refer is court ordered against six board
directors. As a homeowner, to me, this would
raise a lot of interesting questions. First,
after the restraining orders were issued, what's the
status of the association's insurance? I'd want
to know if these defendant-directors are still covered
under my homeowner association's Director &
Officer (D&O) insurance policy? “, says
columnist and author D. Vanitzian.
Then she adds: “These questions are
important because as one Insurance Broker explained to
me today, "intentional acts are typically not
covered under indemnification insurance."
He asked, "Wouldn't that mean that the named
directors are putting all association owners at risk
because they may not be covered by the association's
insurance policy?" The Broker then asked
whether "reservation of rights" letters were
issued to the directors? I discuss these topics
in my book 2008 California Common Interest
Developments-Homeowners Guide published by West, and
in my latest 2009 edition not yet on the shelves,” and
concludes: “Second, as a homeowner, I'd want to know who's paying the directors' attorney bills and will that come back to bite the association in the ass? The Insurance Broker explained to me that "any insurance defense or claim has the potential of raising the insurance rates for everyone." Here, a bigger question might be, shouldn't this apparent breach of directors' fiduciary duties have the Defendants voluntarily stepping down from their board positions so as not to cause further grief or even liability? One doesn't have to be a rocket scientist to figure out that a board with six court-ordered injunctions against it cannot function! Albeit hypothetically, but in the best interests of the association, shouldn't these six directors do what's morally right and step the hell down from those board directorships immediately? Here the yellow brick road bypasses Oz and leads to a courtroom. It appears that this board is six on and six off, does that mean there is no quorum to conduct the association's business? What happens to the decisions made by the half-cocked board? Hello-out there! Reality check: Spotlights are on the ALL these board directors” Some
have argued that the Third board defense hinges on the
use of the term "designated" - however, a
review of meeting minutes dated December
8, 2008 seem to render the argument moot.
RELATED
STORIES PCM
to Dethrone the King – Cash that is! Laguna
Woods Village -
The current mantra for mortgage brokers is that under
the current economic conditions, cash is
king. That is, if you have cash,
stash it under your mattress, as opposed to spending
it, given that the economy is simply going to get
worse. The
Thrilla in the Villa: Laguna Woods, that is - The
Ultimatum
Posted
by: CotoBlogzz | After
a successful Initial Public Offering (IPO) and
experiencing an exponential growth in revenue circa
1996, Gateway Computer issued an ultimatum to a
computer peripheral supplier: You can bid
on a new product, however, you must significantly
improve the quality AND reduce the price of the
new product, or else. The demands were
so drastic that the CEO of the Taiwan-based supplier
conceded in a press release, picked by by various
local newspapers, to having lost the Gateway
account. Another
Political Assassination in the Works
In The Villa Demand
for Full Scale HUD Investigation into Leisure
World/Laguna Woods Affairs Support
Katie McDaniel Bring
it On Fiduciary
Responsibility Primer – Part One PCM
& Third Mutual – The Ultimatum
Cynthia
Conners Being Asked to Resign
New
Third Laguna Hills Mutual of Laguna Woods Village
Board Seated The
Devil Made me Do It - Blame it on the Loopholes The
Right LWV Leadership for Such a Time as This? The
Wealth (or Erosion of) of Homeowners Association
Laguna
Woods Village CC&Rs, What CC&Rs? I Got Your
CC&Rs Right Here! Should
I stay or should I go - in/from my HOA? X Mirror,
mirror on the wall, who is the fairest gladiator of
them all? Chuck
Chuckles: Senator Schumer, That is Pssst,
Can I Interest You In a Lawyer? Dare's
role in Pastures cost association $100,000 If you can keep your home when all about youAre losing theirs and blaming it on raising HOA dues,If you do not get a lien on your home for transfer feesWithout notice, and you are being hated byOthers stuck in escrow so complicated, they have to pay by...
|
ADVERTISEMENT
|
To subscribe/unsubscribe to the CotoBuzz Journal or send
Letters to the Editor
The CotoBuzz Journal P.O. Box 154 Trabuco Canyon, CA 92678 (509) 355-8895
Privacy Policy | Need Help? | Contact Us | Administrator: cotobuzz@yahoo.com