 |
July 2009
We do not make jokes, we simply watch the LA Times, the Orange County Register and CID/HOA board of directors and report the facts
LETTERS
The $4 Million+ Questions
To All
Cris Trapp states that beginning in January 1988, with the
passage of AB 279 in
1987, a transfer fee was no longer collected upon the
sale of a manor. Someone forgot to tell the new buyers
because the financial statements tell us that they paid $4,192,
458.00 just from 1998 to the present time.
PCM and our Boards continue to insist that the Assembly
Bill 279 passed in 1987 made it illegal to charge
a transfer fee. Not
true.
THE TRANSFER FEE WAS NEVER MADE ILLEGAL AND IS STILL
BEING COLLECTED BY GRF.
Janet Price states that the Administrative Fee to GRF
is charged on all resales, and represents the cost to
update the membership records, provide copies of the
governing documents, etc.
According
to
AB 279, September
1987
The
administrative transfer fee of $250 was established on
December 4, 1984, increased to $300 on October 5, 1993
and increased again to $350 effective January 2001.
Existing
law (D/S 1368) authorizes a common interest
subdivision association to charge a fee for providing
copies of certain documents in connection with a
transfer of title of a separate interest.
Cris
Trapp also states that in 2002, the community embarked
on an effort to introduce legislation that would
revise Civil Code1368 to allow the collection of a
resale transfer fee by GRF and/or the housing mutual.
She writes that a legislative strategist was hired by
GRF who was optimistic that the code section could be
revised. The legislative strategist turned out to be a
lobbyist and the effort was unsuccessful. She says
because of strong opposition from the California
Association of Realtors. Wrong again, the revised Polanco
bill ran into a House Rule (see attached HR 77) and
did not get one vote.
One
final comment: GRF should not be involved, they have
no manors. Also, the $350 fee-United and the $400 fee
(Third) is excessive and in violation of section
1366.1, the actual corporation cost is about $30.00
EDITORS NOTE: We asked Ms. Trapp to comment on this letter prior to publication. We have not heard from Ms. Trapp
What reasonable person, in his right mind. would pay $75,000 for something that he could get free. No one, except GRF and PCM. On January 12, 2000, GRF directed PCM staff to research and approach our Legislators from Orange County with a proposal to re-institute transfer fee legislation, Milt Robbins said the the legislature had ruled in 1987 that communities could no longer charge that kind of a fee. Wrong Mr. Robbins; The fact is that AB279 told Leisure World to stop charging an excessive fee that was and still is prohibited by Civil Code Section 1368[c]; "an association shall not impose or collect any assessment, penalty or fee in connection with a transfer of title or any other interest except the organization's actual costs to change its records,"
POLANCO-ROOS
SB 1564
Transfer
Fee
Why did Mike Roos go to State Senator Polanco, Los Angeles,District, to pass a bill that favors Leisure World, located in Orange County. Why weren't Senators Morrow, Ross, Pat Bates, andJohn Campbell consulted?
It just so happens that Mike
Roos, legislative consultant , is a personal friend of
Senator Polanco. This also brings up the question of
who brought Mike Roos into the picture in the first
place. PCM staff had to brief Mike Roos about the
financial situation that exists in Leisure World. When
were these meetings with
Roos held and who participated? Did the
deliberations take place in open meetings or in closed
sessions? How did they arrive at the ridiculous
$75,000. fee they were going to pay Mike Roos?
Milt Johns and Milt Robbins should answer these
questions at the next Board meeting and in the
Director's Corner of the Leisure World News.
Specifically, who,when. where and why did PCM
and GRF hire Mike Roos?* {see footnote below}
Bert
Hack introduced Mike Roos to the Presidents of the
Boards and Milt Johns. The connection could be that
Larry Agran of Irvine is a friend of Bert Hack., from
the anti-El Toro deal. Mike Roos was paid 600,000
dollars to help fight the airfield. He is not a
registered lobbyist but a former assembly man from
Silverlake, Los Angeles who resigned when threaten
with FBI
and IRS
investigations and a recall movement.
In
Sacramento, new bills have to be introduced no later
than 28 February. One method used to get new
legislation introduced after the 28th of February is
to amend a bill that is being considered in the
present session.This means that an existing piece of
legislation must be amended. Mike Roos, a former State
Assemblyman, succeeded in getting Senator
Polanco to amend his bill {SB 1564} which dealt
with manufactured housing. The amended bill now deals
with granting Leisure
World, and only Leisure World.the authority to
charge a transfer fee, The following paragraphs are
included in SB 1564.
"
2)Self determination . The sponsors of
this bill have pointed to
the near
unanimous support from the 16,000 approximate
residents of
Leisure World as evidence that the affected
persons
desire the ability to be masters of their own destiny.
This bill if
enacted though will only affect future
homebuyers.
3)Quasi
Tax levy .
CIDs look and act, in many instances, like
local
governments. The
board of directors may determine
the amount
of homeowners' dues and assessments.
This bill
would allow an assessment to be levied upon the
sale of a home.
Such an
assessment is for all practical effect a transfer
tax.
The
committee may wish to consider and ask of the sponsors
of this measure, why are they unable to increase
assessments on the existing residents who have enjoyed
the use of those facilities. "
*This
is an item about Mike Roos; "Whatever happened to
California Assembly Speaker Pro Tem Mike Roos? you
know. Co-author of the Roos-Roberti 'assault weapon
ban' your talking nationwide. We can tell you about
that. We documented Assembly Roos' politics in a 14-
page mailer, sent it to all his constituents, asked
them to call the FB! and DOJ to demand an
investigation, then started a recall campaign. Roos
resigned 10 weeks later.They said it couldn't be done
in a 70% Demo district. We did it and liked it"
Substantially
Amended Bills
77.2.
If the analysis of an amendment adopted on the
floor
discloses
that the amendment makes a substantial substantive
change to a bill
as
passed by the last committee of reference, the bill,
as amended, may be
referred
by the Speaker to the appropriate committee.
A bill
that was previously reported from a policy or fiscal
committee
of reference in compliance with Joint Rule 61 is not
subject to the
deadlines
in Joint Rule 61 if the bill is subsequently referred
to a policy or
fiscal
committee pursuant to this rule.
If the
digest to an Assembly Bill that has been returned to
the
Assembly
by the Senate for concurrence in Senate amendments
discloses that the
Senate
has made a substantial substantive change in the bill
as first passed by
the
Assembly, the bill may be referred by the Speaker to
the appropriate
committee.
ASSEMBLY BILL 2546 - MARKETING AND SELLING PROPERTY
This law voids any rule or regulation that arbitrarily or unreasonably restricts the ability of an owner to market his or her property. The new law also prohibits an association from adopting, enforcing or imposing a rule or regulation that: (1) imposes an assessment or fee in connection with the marketing of an owner's property interest in excess of the association's actual or direct costs;
or (2) establishes an exclusive relationship with a real estate broker through which the sale or marketing to the property is required to occur. \par
CHAPTER 596
An act to amend Sections 1366 and 1368 of the Civil Code,
relating to homeowner’s associations.
(Approved by the Governor September 12, 1987.
Filed with
Secretary of State September 14, 1987)
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST
AB 279, Frazee
Common interest developments
Existing law
limits the assessment increases that may be imposed by
the board of directors of a homeowner’s association
for a common interest development by generally
limiting an increase in the regular assessment to 10%
per year and by limiting special assessments to 5% of
the budgeted gross expenses, without the approval of
the owners casting a majority of votes at a meeting or
election, as specified. However, as exceptions to that
limitation, existing law provides that the limit does
not apply to increases for the purpose of the
maintenance or repair of common areas or for emergency
situations.
This bill
would, instead, limit the percentage increase in
regular assessments to 20% and would also provide that
the regular and special assessment limits may not be
exceeded without the approval of owners constituting a
quorum, as defined. The bill would also define the
emergency situations for which those limitations may
be exceeded.
Existing law
requires a common interest subdivision association to
levy assessments sufficient to perform its obligations
unless otherwise provided in the governing declaration
of the association. Existing law limits assessments
increases by the association and those limits are in
addition to limitations in the governing declaration.
This bill with
respect to the duty to levy assessments, would
eliminate the provisions that made that duty subject
to any other provision of the declaration, and with
respect to the limitation on assessment increases,
would make those limitations applicable not
withstanding any more restrictive limitations in the
governing documents.
Existing
law authorizes a common interest subdivision
association to charge a fee for providing
copies of certain documents in connection with
a transfer of title of a separate interest.
This bill would
provide that an association shall not impose or
collect any assessment, penalty, or fee in connection
with a transfer of title except
the association’s actual costs to change its records
and the fee for providing documents.
The people of the State of California do enact
as follows:
Section
1. Section 1366 of the Civil Code is amended to read:
1366.
(a) Except as provided in this section, the
association shall levy regular
and special assessments sufficient to perform
its obligations under the governing documents and this
title.
(b)
Notwithstanding more restrictive limitations placed on
the board by the governing documents , the board of
directors may not impose a regular assessment
that is more than 20 percent greater than the
regular assessment for the association’s preceding
fiscal year or impose special assessments which in the
aggregate exceed 5 percent of the budgeted gross
expenses of the association for that fiscal year
without the approval of the owners, constituting a
quorum, casting a majority of the votes at a meeting
or election of the association conducted in accordance
with Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 7510) of Part
3 of Division 2 of Title 1 of the Corporations Code
and Section 7613 of the Corporations Code. For the
purposes of this section, quorum means more than 50
percent of the owners of
an association. This section does not limit
assessment increases necessary for emergency
situations. For purposes of this section, an emergency
situations one of the following:
(1) An
extraordinary expense required by an order of the
court.
(2) An
extraordinary expense necessary to repair or maintain
the common interest development or any part of it for
which the association is responsible where a threat to
personal safety on the property is discovered.
(3) An
extraordinary expense necessary to repair or maintain
the common interest development or any part of it for
which the association is responsible that could not
have been more reasonably foreseen by the board in
preparing and distributing the proforma operating
budget under Section 1365. However, prior to the
imposition or collection of an assessment under this
subdivision, the board shall pass a resolution
containing written findings as to the necessity of the
extraordinary expense involved and why the expense was
not or could not been reasonably foreseen in the
budgeting process, and the resolution shall be
distributed to the members with the notice of the
assessment.
(c)
Regular and special assessments levied pursuant
to the governing documents are delinquent 15 days
after they become due. If an assessment is delinquent
the association may recover all of the following:
(1)
Reasonable costs incurred in collecting the
delinquent assessment, including reasonable
attorney’s fees.
(2)
A late charge not exceeding 10 percent of the
delinquent assessment or ten dollars ($10), whichever
is the greater, unless the declaration specifies a
late charge in a smaller amount, in which case any
late charge imposed shall not exceed the amount
specified in the declaration.
(3)
Interest on all sums imposed in accordance with
this section, including the delinquent assessment,
reasonable costs of collection, and late charges, at
an annual percentage rate not to exceed 12 percent
interest, commencing 30 days after the assessment
becomes due.
(d)
Associations are hereby exempted from
interest-rate limitations imposed by Article XV of the
California Constitution, subject to the limitations of
this section.
SEC.
2 Section
1368 of the Civil Code is amended to read:
1368.
(a) The owner of the separate interest, other
than an owner subject to the requirements of Section
11018.6 of
the Business
and Professions Code,
shall, as soon as practicable before transfer of title
to the separate interest or execution of a real
property sales contract therefor, as defined in
Section 2985, provide the following to the prospective
purchaser.
(1) A
copy of the governing documents of the common interest
development.
(2) If
there is a restriction in the governing documents
limiting the occupancy, residency, or use of a
separate interest on the basis of age in a manner
different from that provided in Section 51.3, a
statement that the restriction is only enforceable in
the extent permitted by Section 51.3 and a statement
specifying the applicable provisions of Section 51.3.
(3) A
copy of the most recent financial statement
distributed pursuant
to Section1365.
(4)
A true statement in writing from an authorized
representative of the association as to the amount of
any assessments levied upon the owner’s interest in
the common interest development which are unpaid on
the date of the statement. The statement shall also
include true information on late charges, interest,
and costs of collections which, as of the date of the
statement, are
and may be made a lien upon the owner’s interest in
a common interest development pursuant to Section1367.
(b)
Upon written request, an association shall,
within 10 days of the mailing or delivery of the
request, provide the owner of a separate interest with
a copy of the requested items specified
in paragraphs (1), (2),
(3) and (4) of subdivision (a). The association
may charge a fee for this service which shall not
exceed the association’s reasonable cost to prepare
and reproduce the requested items.
(c) An
association shall not impose or collect any
assessment, penalty, or fee in connection with a
transfer of title or any other interest except the
association’s actual costs to change its records and
that authorized by subdivision (b).
(d) Any
person or entity who willfully violates this section
shall be liable to the purchaser of a separate
interest which is subject to this section for actual
damages occasioned thereby and, in addition, shall pay
a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed five
hundred dollars ($500). In an action to enforce this
liability, the prevailing party shall be awarded
reasonable attorney’s fees.
(e)
Nothing in this section affects the validity of title
to real property transferred in violation of this
section.
(f) In
addition to the requirements of this section, an owner
transferring title to a separate interest shall comply
with applicable requirements of Sections 1133 and
1134.
RELATED VIDEO CLIPS
|
| If
you would like to make a comment about a
specific news article, editorial or commentary
and have it considered for publication in the
CotoBuzz Journal as a Letter, Photo or Video
Clip to the Editor,
please send it to buzz@cotobuzz.com
--- or
mail to Letters to the Editor, c/o CotoBuzz,
P,O. Box 154, Trabuco Canyon, CA 92678 Letters should be brief, and may be edited for clarity and length. All material become the property of CotoBuzz Journal and may be republished in any format. Please include your full name, mailing address and daytime phone number (your number will not be published). |
|
|
| RSS Feeds | Buzzzzz | ||||||
|
|
|
|
||
 |
Comments.
|
|
|
|
To Recall or No
Recall, & The HOA Hall of Shame
The Hen House Guarded by the Fox in Laguna Woods Village's
Foster's Farm & the Hall of Shame - News
This Friday at 2:00 PM
Posted
by CotoBlogzz | 06/17/2009 04:00 PM
Hoist
By Their Own Petard - Fuses get shorter in Laguna
Woods Village
Posted by CotoBlogzz | 06/03/2009 05:00 PMLaguna Woods
Village, CA -So, exactly what happened during
yesterday?s Golden Rain Foundation (GRF) board of
directors meeting in Laguna Woods
United
Recall Petition Signed Sealed and Delivered - Finance
Committee Meeting
Laguna Woods Village, CA - As promised, earlier today
United Mutual director Michael Curtis during the
Finance Committee Meeting, delivered a petition to
recall certain United board boards, with close to 100
verified signatures over an above the required...
United
Board Recall In Final Stretch ? 4th of July in June!
Laguna Woods Village, CA - Change is in the air. So is
anticipation, excitement, thrill and for some, fear.
Fear that their telephones are bugged. Fear of
retribution. Fear of the unknown.
Prosecuting
Mr. Curtis - or is it Persecuting?
Posted by CotoBlogzz | 05/26/2009 8:30 PMPCM General
Manager Milt Johns, taking exception to the coverage
by Orange County Register of the recent exile of
United Mutual Director Michael Curtis from his own
community, documents his displeasure at the..
Laguna
Woods Village - United Board on Official Notice
TO: United Board:About a month ago, the official
"United Membership List" was provided to me
by Bill Hart. I believe it is dated April 29th. This
is being used to verify all signatures on the Removal
(or recall) Petition, so that the official...
The
$5 Million Landscape Budget and Recall Petition
Laguna Woods Village, CA - We have been to Laguna
Woods Village. We have seen Laguna Woods Village. The
place is nicely kept, but how many gardeners does it
take to justify a $5 million/year budget?That is the
question residents are asking, as the...
How
to recognize a cheater
The traditional cheater is, for example, the crude
sneak thief. He is also the small-time bureaucrat or
politician on the take. He needs little skill and much
gall to extract his living. But he lives in constant
danger of being caught in the act and...
Laguna
Third Mutual's President Queries Answered
Which wolf will you feed today? Posted by CotoBlogzz |
05/06/2009 9:00 AM | Have you heard the story about an
old man who keeps struggling with two constantly
fighting wolves? The first wolf represents truth, the
second represents evil. When he...
Laguna
Woods Village Budget
I keep hearing at all the committee meetings, the
capital expenses being approved come out of reserves
and will not add anything to our monthly assessments.I
beg to differ.
Law?
What Law? WE are the Law! Recent find
of Original Documents were mailed to each President
(GRF, Third Laguna Hills Mutual and United Laguna
Hills Mutual), together with information sheets
from OriginalTrust and amendment to the Trust dated
Jan. 9, 1969. These documents stated how and why Ross
Cortese, the developer of Leisure World Laguna Hills,
changed the concept of Leisure World Laguna Hills from
a Senior Citizen non-profit Co- operative to a Senior
Citizen non-profit Condominium Complex.
New
Golden Rain Foundation Rules of Engagement
On the heels of the Golden Rain Foundation?s (of Seal
Beach) decision to appeal the recent Court of Appeals
decision, on a financial transparency lawsuit, to the
state Supreme Court, the embattled GRF HOA board of
directors recently decided to enact...
Cynthia
Conners Being Asked to Resign
New
Third Laguna Hills Mutual of Laguna Woods Village
Board Seated
The
Devil Made me Do It - Blame it on the Loopholes
During Thursday?s CZ Master Association?s Candidate?s
Night designed for Coto de Caza residents to meet the
candidates running for two seats on the CZ Master
board, the first question mischaracterized our
position, asking an either or question: ?Buzz...
The
Right LWV Leadership for Such a Time as This?
Is this general manager (Milt Johns) over his head in
his management skills? Can someone come out with only
experience from the garden to manage a 90 million
dollar business without a conflict of interest? When
is the last time Mr. Johns lowered our costs...
$2
million Verdict Returned Against Homeowners
Association
Conduct constituted malice, oppression, or fraud and
committed by one or more officers, directors or
managing agents of the HOA - Presiding Juror Earlier
this week a jury in a case filed in Superior Court of
California Riverside, a jury ruled in favor...
GRF
2009 Budget Review, Be There or Be Out of Luck!
Letter from LWV resident M. Curtis inviting concerned
residents: Tomorrow (Tuesday, July 22) at 9AM, in the
Community Center Board Room, GRF will have a Special
Corporate (all boards) meeting to review next year's
budget. See the...
Different
Homeowners Association, Same Issues
I assume that you are a member of the Walnut Creek
Leisure World Association, or is this another HOA in
the area? We have had many comments of similar
problems by HOA's who happen to run into our website
and I'm glad that you contacted me
The
Right LWV Leadership for Such a Time as This?
Is this general manager (Milt Johns) over his head in
his management skills? Can someone come out with only
experience from the garden to manage a 90 million
dollar business without a conflict of interest? When
is the last time Mr. Johns lowered our costs...
Working
to Serve, Or Serving To Work - Letter to OC Register
Columnist
Another good column. I was wondering if there was ever
any serious consideration to any non-union government
employee for the position of publicly elected Sheriff
by either the Register or Supervisors? That is all I
see in your Top Five selection and...
To
Destroy a Community, or to Destroy the Status
Quo?XThat is the Question in this Letter to the
Menifee SCCA Board of Directors
First of all I have no intentions or no desire to
destroy "our community". However, I must ask
you to please define what you think the community is,
what it is you think I am threatening to
destroy?Secondly, Sun City has been declared a
"blighted...
HOMEOWNER
ASSOCIATION TITLEHOLDERS ARE "HUMAN CAPITAL"
by D. Vanitzian(c) 2007 Donie VanitzianWhen criminal
liability is not charged against the
"criminals" in an association, then the
titleholders become the Human Capital used to fund the
criminal activities and wrongdoing.
HOMEOWNER
ASSOCIATIONS: A CLUB YOU DON'T WANT TO BELONG TO
This ain't no party! This ain't no disco! This ain't
no community!
Dare's
role in Pastures cost association $100,000
By BRENDAN J. LYONS, Senior writer First published:
Sunday, Times Union August 12, 2007. Republished with
permissionAugust 12, 2007 ALBANY -- An advocate for
the Historic Pastures Homeowners Association, which
lost more than $100,000 in...
HIRING
AN ATTORNEY CAN BE HAZARDOUS TO YOUR HEALTH LEGAL
BLACKMAIL--TAKING CLIENTS HOSTAGE- Q: How can you tell
when an attorney is lying? A. His lips are
moving.August 10, 2007 If California can place caps on
spending and caps on fees of various types of
businesses -- then it needs to put caps...
BRING
BACK GOVERNOR PETE WILSON
by Donie Vanitzian, JD(c) 2007 D. VanitzianYou can?t
have a good old boys and girls club without a little
help from friends in high places, of course, a little
help from California?s State Bar wouldn?t hurt either.
[FN1]Forget for a moment that the term...
Should
I stay or should I go - in/from my HOA? X
First was the Delegate?s Corner blasting CZ Master
Association board of director?s critics for speaking
out against a corrupt delegate system and electoral
process in favor of direct elections, consistent with
current legislation, and consistent with the...
Casta
Courier Coverage of Unhappy Campers at Leisure World
I'd like to comment on the following paragraph that
was in your publication "The Casta Courier"
on July 19, 2007. The second paragraph reads as
follows:
SPENDING
OTHER PEOPLE?S MONEY by Donie Vanitzian, JDX(c) 2007
Vanitzian
I mean really! How difficult is it to spend other
people?s money? Cheech!! It?s a no brainer, especially
with no statutory accountability. "Hey man, it
ain't difficult" one board member tells me, he
says "no one gives s**t." He proceeds to
point to his...
Critics
do not attend board meetings - GRF that is!
Critics do not attend Home Owner Association Meetings
to learn of actions deemed necessary by their
Board!August 6, 2007 Critics are principally
individuals who fail to attend Home Owner Association
Meetings to learn of actions deemed necessary...
The
New Seven, err... Eight Wonders of the World
CZ's definition for leadership is that whenever
questions are raised, the canned response is ?Remember
the Reserves?! Now CZ Spin Machine has to be the Eight
Wonder of the World!- August 6, 2007 The results of
the NOWC?s New Seven Wonders of...
"TWIN
RIVERS" = "TRIPLE PROBLEMS"
Note to the do-gooders whose glasses are corrupted by
the half-full half-empty circular-argument nonsense
and who want only to hear the good-of-it-all and
nothing too depressing, oh, and want only smiley ha-ha
journalism: Go grab your teddy bears and...
Lawyer
seeking condominiums' business goes over the line
Question: I manage a large condominium project in Los
Angeles. Unsolicited, an attorney sent me an
invitation to meet with him over lunch. He then phoned
me several times, including the day before the lunch,
explaining the purpose was to speak only with...
CONDOMINIUMS
ARE A GREAT INVESTMENT- FOR LAWYERS
About every two months I get a call, or a client comes
in to ask me about condominiums. It usually starts off
with, ?I bought this adorable little condo? and then
the upstairs neighbor had a flood?. And then the
Homeowners Association refused??
Paraphrasing
the LA Times on Defeat of SB670 & Wicked Twin
Witches of the West - SB 127 & AB-980
Taking a page out of the OC Register?s ?paraphrased
reporting?, an article written by LA Times staff
writer Diane Weder titled ?Bill to limit transfer fee
founders?, published appropriately on May 13, 2007,
quotes the president of the statewide Realtors...
Private
Transfer Tax - Good for the Common Interest
Development (HOA/CID) Industry or Good for the
Politicians?
When we received our copy of the report that the
California Association of Realtors (CAR) used to
Sponsor and help draft transfer fees, we were
confused. Given that Vanitzian has become an icon in
Sacrament (some say a thorn in the legislature's
side),...
Management
company's tape-recording tactic puts homeowners at
risk
Question: Because our management company has been sued
before, it has a policy of recording all incoming and
outgoing phone calls. Before a management employee
answers the phone, there is an automatic announcement
warning callers they are being recorded....
Of
Trial Lawyers, the AAJ and the Democratic Party
The National College of Advocacy and AAJ Education
maintain two distinct programs that recognize AAJ
lawyer member efforts in pursuit of advanced legal
learning and professional development?the Achievement
Recognition Program and Advanced Studies in Trial...
Laguna
Woods Village CC&Rs, What CC&Rs? I Got Your
CC&Rs Right Here!
Coto de Caza is not the only place where the board of
directors consistently either disregard the civil
code, governing documents (Covenants, Conditions and
Restrictions - CC&Rs) or even the moral code.
What
is better in HOA Management? Transparency and
Accountability or Feel Good?May 22, 2007
Mostly as a result of the Enron and Worldcom scandals,
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 known as the Public
Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act
of 2002 and commonly called SOX; was enacted to
provide business executives with less wiggle...
HOW
DO OWNERS SPELL L-A-W S-U-I-T? SENATE BILL NO. 127!X
This author asks WHERE ARE THE PENALTIES AGAINST
MANAGEMENT COMPANIES AND BOARDS? WHAT?S THE PENALTY
FOR BREAKING THE LAWS THAT THESE LEGISLATORS ARE
PASSING?
Two
of the Worst & Most Detrimental Laws to Hit
California are Sponsored by None Other than:
California Association of Realtors (R) The Gold is
Gone --No more gold in the Golden State!
Dear Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger,
SHATZI! PLEASE REMEMBER YOUR PROMISE TO US. Please
listen to the people who support you and look to you
to help us! When you first began buying property in
California NO ONE told you what you could or could not
do...
THE
LAW OF INTENDED CONSEQUENCES - WHAT A DIFFERENCE A
"WORD" MAKES: NO! ON ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 563
It apparently does not matter that titleholders with a
vested interest in their property cannot get their
legislators to carry legislation to help US, but, they
can waste taxpayer funds by preventing the bills WE
WANT and NEED by CHANGING *ONE* WORD in an...
EMERGENCY!
EMERGENCY! OOPS! WE JUST HAD THE MEETING! YOU MISSED
IT!!
So THIS is what the Senate calls an "Open
Meeting." How many Open Meetings have THEY been
to? Obviously not many. ROTFLMAO!
CAN
YOU OUTSWIM YOUR HOA SHARKS? or will you drown trying?
Owning, let alone living in an HOA is a tough JOB and
requires you be physically fit, possess a certain
sophistication of the processes, and have the
character let alone stamina, that allows you to be
persistent in a manner that indescribable to REAL...
HEY
GRAY PANTHERS! YOU GOT IT WRONG!
(c) D. Vanitzian
May 16, 2007The Gray Panthers are on record as
SUPPORTING A BAD BAD BAD BAD BILL: Senate Bill Number
948. SHAME ON YOU. Where the heck are you getting your
information from?
The
Law of Unintended Consequences: Legislation and HOA
BOD Cause and Effect: Clueless in my CAR
Coming off a most improbable but successful campaign
to defeat SB 670 author and HOA advocate Vanitizian
thanks supporters making a connection between the
quality of legislation being passed in Sacramento, and
the quality of life in most homeowners...
|
Select Blogzz & click icon |
|
|
|
BlogzzSphere |
||
|
|
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
|
|
