|
|
July 2009 We do not make jokes, we simply watch the LA Times, the Orange County Register and CID/HOA board of directors and report the facts |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Another CAI Myth Bust - The Case of the Laguna Woods Village Dueling Lawyer Letters Posted by CotoBlogzz | 06-21-2009 | According to its website, the Community
Associations Institute (CAI) is an
“organization dedicated to fostering vibrant,
competent, harmonious community associations. For more
than 30 years, CAI has been the leader in providing
education and resources to the volunteer homeowners
who govern community associations and the
professionals who support them”. Indeed, the CAI is an influential trade association and
special interest group, dominated by lawyers and
community managers that petitions for legislative
beneficence for its members. According to Evan
McKenzie, the author of a book critical of
common-interest developments, the CAI has been able to
shape legislative and judicial policy making, prevent
meaningful regulation of CID activity, and keep the
discourse on such matters largely private. The CAI in undated article titled Community
Association Conflict, available online
from the Community
Associations Institute (CAI) asserts that
“Rather than
David-versus-Goliath conflicts, as occasionally
portrayed in the media, disputes in community
associations are disagreements among people.
Differences of opinion among homeowners, or between
individual homeowners and their community
associations, often reflect the challenge of balancing
the preferences of the individual homeowner with the
best interests of the community as a whole”.
To underscore this point, the most frequent
answer to homeowner’s complaints we often hear
from public servants is: “why don’t you
throw the bums out”? Part of the answer is
provided by McKenzie
“in
the absence of meaningful legislative regulation or
oversight, the idea of residential private government
later dominated by lawyers and property managers
through CAI has resulted in the
institutionalization of a heavy–handed
managerial focus in CID governance.” He says. Our own research shows that McKenzie has a point.
In the piece titled Lowering
the Bar – A Kinder Gentler California Bar
we conclude that in most complaints against
attorney’s representing residents in common interest
development communities, the California Bar “ even when the complaints have been
taken all the way up to the Supreme Court, the Bar's
typical response is “If you file a lawsuit against
the attorney and you win, we may then get involved”
– and this is precisely what property management
companies and CAI prompters and supporters are
counting on – residents in most cases are either
afraid and or do not have the means to mount a
protracted legal battle, whereas a property management
company aided and abetted by a board of directors can
turn a common interested development community into a
private fiefdom and an ATM with endless funding. Just this past Friday, the past president of the Villa Point Condominium Association
in Newport Beach proved how easy it is for the CID
establishment to hide theft:
Peter Kontos was sentenced to two years in
state prison for embezzling
over $500,000 from a condominium
association To hide the theft, Kontos simply
recruited busy homeowners to sit on the Board
of Directors with him, knowing they would not be able
to attend meetings. In addition to the theft of
association funds, Kontos caused thousands of dollars
in damage to the association's property by personally
undertaking unauthorized property improvements, which
later had to be fixed by the association. The
Coto de Caza board of directors in defiance of the
2006 California legislature initiative aimed at
bringing direct democracy to common interest
development communities continues to hold on to an arcane
delegate system critics call most corrupt “Let’s
face it. CZ’s delegate electoral process
is about as corrupt as exists in Communist China,
Vietnam and Cuba. We have no democracy in
Coto de Caza, only
elections that have brought us three dues increases in
five years and Reserves at less than 30% when they
should be at 70% or higher. Facts are
facts and those are the facts. And, those
feeding at the trough will continue to support the
current system” writes Joseph Morabito, a
successful entrepreneur and former member of the CZ
master association board of directors. It
is generally assumed that due diligence and best
business judgment is used in the dispensing of
association affairs, contrary to the use of
unprecedented legal resources to squelch free speech,
or to spend $2 million/year for a new security company
without due diligence, or to fire the CHP, then
“forget” to certify streets for law enforcement
pro-active traffic patrol, to fire a security
committee chairperson for refusing to place personal
priorities over safety.
These actions by the Coto de Caza board of
directors have not only led to three dues increases
in five years and reserves at less than 30%, the
fourth website in five years, but also the tragic
death of two residents directly traceable to traffic
enforcement, or lack thereof. Hans
Strupat, publisher of SaveMarinaHills.org noted that
the board
of directors approved audited
financials with Keystone, the property management
company's approval, even though he had many mostly
obvious but unanswered questions.
removed without cause. Ms McDaniel continues to fight the move. In this case, the Third Laguna Hills Mutual filed a Notice of Appeal of the Superior Court order issuing the preliminary injunction preventing the board from filling Ms. McDaniel’s seat; Also, the Third Laguna Hills Mutual filed a Motion to Stay Discovery pending the appeal. The motion will be heard on July 20,2009 at 1:30 p.m. Whereas Ms. McDaniel’s attorney has filed three Motions to Compel attendance at deposition against three members of the board of directors of Third for failing to attend their properly noticed depositions. These motions will also be heard on July 20, 2009 in Department C31 of the Orange County Superior Court. The court has set a settlement conference with the parties on July 20, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. in Department C31 of the Orange County Superior Court. Peter Nitschke, Mr Curtis' attorney, in a cease and desist letter to Bill Hart, United's legal counsel writes, "as you well know, the use of United's assets and resources to engage in electioneering activities violates both the California Civil Code and the California Corporations Code and must immediately stop". Then on June 25, because of the questionable activity surrounding the process is prompted to write a rules letter to clarify the ground rules in effect for the Town Hall Meeting scheduled for tomorrow. For his part, Bill Hart responds with a lawyer letter of his own echoing charging Mr. Curtis of engaging in "a daily series of vitriolic, rude and possibly defamatory communication with individual United Board members, PCM employees and independent contractors in an apparent effort to exercise control over the Recall procedures that are currently under way." So if, Mr. Curtis communication is characterized as vitriolic, rude and defamatory" by Mr. Hart, how does he characterize the behavior of GRF president Erwin Stuller and other board members toward Mr. Curtis? We already know how uber-sensitive PCM employees are, so we are not going there. Perhaps CAI Lawyers are right: You cannot make 100% of the residents in a CID environment happy, so forget about it. On the other hand, this clearly shows that given the same facts, people end up with different conclusions. For instance, there has not been a successful recall in Mr. Curtis community for over 45 years. CAI attorneys may be quick to point out this fact as evidence that CAI has been successful. Others like Mr. Curtis will point out that contrary to the CAI 's assertion that the David-versus-Goliath conflicts, as occasionally portrayed in the media, disputes in community associations are merely disagreements among people, these incidents are not occasional in nature, and these are usually between disgusted residents and the CAI industry.
For instance, so sure was Mr. Curtis of his case that he thought the recall process would be swift, successful, relatively inexpensive and painless. It has been everything but, on all counts. If you want to contribute to Mr. Curtis's Legal Defense Fund, contact the writer.
Stirring
Up the Pot The
Hatched Transfer Fee Story The
Man Behind the Curtain The
OC Register - Argument for Community Journalism To
Recall or No Recall, & The HOA Hall of Shame Fact
or Fiction? - You Be the Judge The
(Landscape) Work Is Not Done Until All Directors are
Taken Care of Review
of Agreement between CZ Master Association and
dwellingLIVE Lowering
the Bar ? A Kinder Gentler California Bar WHAT'S
EATING CALIFORNIA LAW REVISION COMMISSION'S LAWYER
BRIAN HEBERT? Just
Say No to Plumping? SupplierGate
and the Circus Comes to Town - You cannot make this up Laguna
Woods Village Board Meetings - You cannot make this up Beware
Of Coto de Caza?s Website Desperate
(HOA) Directors - Out of Order Circus
Comes to Town June 9, 2009 Desperate
Directors of Laguna Woods - The Facts Behind the
Fiction Hoist
By Their Own Petard - Fuses get shorter in Laguna
Woods Village WHAT'S
EATING CALIFORNIA LAW REVISION COMMISSION'S LAWYER
BRIAN HEBERT? To Recall or No
Recall, & The HOA Hall of Shame The Hen House Guarded by the Fox in Laguna Woods Village's
Foster's Farm & the Hall of Shame - News
This Friday at 2:00 PM Posted
by CotoBlogzz | 06/17/2009 04:00 PM Hoist
By Their Own Petard - Fuses get shorter in Laguna
Woods Village United
Recall Petition Signed Sealed and Delivered - Finance
Committee Meeting United
Board Recall In Final Stretch ? 4th of July in June! Prosecuting
Mr. Curtis - or is it Persecuting? Laguna
Woods Village - United Board on Official Notice The
$5 Million Landscape Budget and Recall Petition How
to recognize a cheater Laguna
Third Mutual's President Queries Answered Laguna
Woods Village Budget Law?
What Law? WE are the Law! Recent find
of Original Documents were mailed to each President
(GRF, Third Laguna Hills Mutual and United Laguna
Hills Mutual), together with information sheets
from OriginalTrust and amendment to the Trust dated
Jan. 9, 1969. These documents stated how and why Ross
Cortese, the developer of Leisure World Laguna Hills,
changed the concept of Leisure World Laguna Hills from
a Senior Citizen non-profit Co- operative to a Senior
Citizen non-profit Condominium Complex. New
Golden Rain Foundation Rules of Engagement Cynthia
Conners Being Asked to Resign
New
Third Laguna Hills Mutual of Laguna Woods Village
Board Seated The
Devil Made me Do It - Blame it on the Loopholes The
Right LWV Leadership for Such a Time as This?
$2
million Verdict Returned Against Homeowners
Association GRF
2009 Budget Review, Be There or Be Out of Luck! Different
Homeowners Association, Same Issues The
Right LWV Leadership for Such a Time as This? Working
to Serve, Or Serving To Work - Letter to OC Register
Columnist To
Destroy a Community, or to Destroy the Status
Quo?XThat is the Question in this Letter to the
Menifee SCCA Board of Directors HOMEOWNER
ASSOCIATION TITLEHOLDERS ARE "HUMAN CAPITAL" HOMEOWNER
ASSOCIATIONS: A CLUB YOU DON'T WANT TO BELONG TO Dare's
role in Pastures cost association $100,000 HIRING
AN ATTORNEY CAN BE HAZARDOUS TO YOUR HEALTH LEGAL BRING
BACK GOVERNOR PETE WILSON Should
I stay or should I go - in/from my HOA? X Casta
Courier Coverage of Unhappy Campers at Leisure World SPENDING
OTHER PEOPLE?S MONEY by Donie Vanitzian, JDX(c) 2007
Vanitzian Critics
do not attend board meetings - GRF that is! The
New Seven, err... Eight Wonders of the World "TWIN
RIVERS" = "TRIPLE PROBLEMS" Lawyer
seeking condominiums' business goes over the line
CONDOMINIUMS
ARE A GREAT INVESTMENT- FOR LAWYERS Paraphrasing
the LA Times on Defeat of SB670 & Wicked Twin
Witches of the West - SB 127 & AB-980 Private
Transfer Tax - Good for the Common Interest
Development (HOA/CID) Industry or Good for the
Politicians? Management
company's tape-recording tactic puts homeowners at
risk Of
Trial Lawyers, the AAJ and the Democratic Party Laguna
Woods Village CC&Rs, What CC&Rs? I Got Your
CC&Rs Right Here! What
is better in HOA Management? Transparency and
Accountability or Feel Good?May 22, 2007 HOW
DO OWNERS SPELL L-A-W S-U-I-T? SENATE BILL NO. 127!X Two
of the Worst & Most Detrimental Laws to Hit
California are Sponsored by None Other than:
California Association of Realtors (R) The Gold is
Gone --No more gold in the Golden State! THE
LAW OF INTENDED CONSEQUENCES - WHAT A DIFFERENCE A
"WORD" MAKES: NO! ON ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 563 EMERGENCY!
EMERGENCY! OOPS! WE JUST HAD THE MEETING! YOU MISSED
IT!! CAN
YOU OUTSWIM YOUR HOA SHARKS? or will you drown trying? HEY
GRAY PANTHERS! YOU GOT IT WRONG! The
Law of Unintended Consequences: Legislation and HOA
BOD Cause and Effect: Clueless in my CAR
Coming off a most improbable but successful campaign
to defeat SB 670 author and HOA advocate Vanitizian
thanks supporters making a connection between the
quality of legislation being passed in Sacramento, and
the quality of life in most homeowners...
|
ADVERTISEMENT
|
To subscribe/unsubscribe to the CotoBuzz Journal or send
Letters to the Editor
The CotoBuzz Journal P.O. Box 154 Trabuco Canyon, CA 92678 (509) 355-8895
Privacy Policy | Need Help? | Contact Us | Administrator: cotobuzz@yahoo.com