|
May 2008 ISSUE We do not make jokes, we simply watch the LA Times, the Orange County Register and CID/HOA board of directors and report the facts! |
||||||
|
The New and Improved OCSD – Letter to Orange County Supervisor Pate Bates April
29,
2008 To: OC
Board of Supervisors, Ms Pat Bates As you may know, the CotoBuzz Journal is
committed to public safety. To that end, for the last five years we have
worked with the CHP, the OCSD the FBI and the
Department of Justice developing what we refer to as
public safety management tools and have reported
on anything and everything related to public safety,
from crime and vandalism to traffic accidents.
Our focus is the Canyon areas, including the
communities of Coto de Caza, Ladera Ranch and Dove
Canyon In general, we have received tremendous support
from the various law enforcement agencies.
However, getting the information from the OCSD is a
struggle- see below. In the past we have paid
for programming charges. If you are familiar
with programming charges, once a program is in place,
you simply activate a key and out comes the report.
Effective immediately, the OCSD has informed us that
we need to pay recurring programming charges for said
report. We do not mind, but this implies there
is something wrong, either with the IT management or
the operations side at the OCSD. Any help you can provide is appreciated. For reference, the “new charges” were implemented immediately after a CotoBuzz Journal reader questioned the validity of the OCSD supplied data. Note received from CotoBuzz Journal forwarded to
the OCSD follows: Hello, When you are reporting the crime rates, you need
to remember that OCSD was accused of “doctoring”
the reported crime rates. This is a major problem in
many law enforcement agencies. One example I can give
you: There is a police department in OC that
misreports their homicide rate…. The agency reports one homicide per location,
meaning if there is three dead bodies at one location
and they are all related, the agency only reports the
homicide to the FBI as “one” crime…. Their
attitude is “because we only use one “report
number,” we only report one death…. This is
different from a “missing person report.” On a
missing person report, it is law that each missing
person shall be reported on a separate “report
number.” The reason for this is it is possible that three
people go missing (run away) and one of the people
return. The agency then has to remove the missing
person from the NCIC, but the other two missing
persons will be outstanding. Another example is, a
stolen vehicle, they are reported separately because
if there was four cars stolen from a dealership they
might locate one of the vehicles and the other three
vehicles will still be outstanding, but they need to
clear the one recovered vehicle and remove it from the
computer system (SVS) “stolen vehicle system.” I just wanted to give you a little insight on how they “pad” the crime rates…… You are wasting your time with Supervisor Pat Bates. Even though Bob Varo inappropriately endorsed Ms. Bates as CZ President, she has done absolutely nothing for our community that I can see. And, she does not respond to e-mails or any other communications. This is just another case of an incompetent politician who collects a good salary and accomplishes nothing important for her constituents. When we see some money to fund the maintenance of our essentially public sports park we will know that Supervisor Bates is in touch with our community. Until then Ms. Bates is missing in action. Joseph Morabito, former member CZ board of director Hi
Joe: You
may be right about Supervisor Bates, As
evidenced by everything we have published in the
CotoBuzz Journal, we have supported the OCSD
unconditionally. The
Grand Jury investigation in the murder of inmate
Chamberlain has revealed a pattern with the OCSD we
have personal experience with and want to see how it
can be addressed. When
we get immediate response from every other law
enforcement agency, the OCSD is for the most part
unreliable. For
example, we have written multiple times to Lt., Bill
Griffin, who authors the Chief’s Corner in the CZ
Newsletter – no response.
CotoBlogzz Tagzz - use any number of social networking managers to share this (or any other articles in the Internet) with others...click here and select social bookmarkings threads RELATED
STORIES
Dangerous
Coto de Caza Roads and Intersections Coto
de Caza, 2Q2007 CHP Collision Summary 1Q2007
Coto de Caza Crime and Vandalism Report Teen
Hacker Endangers Lake Forest Couple CZ
Master Association CC&R Violator's List The
Maturing of Coto de Caza-Coto de Caza is no longer
GRUP City! The
CotoBuzz Journal March 2007 The
CotoBuzz Journal February 2007 CHP
DOES ITS JOB – CZ BOARD PLEASE DO YOURS!
-
Despite the public abuse the CHP has received
from the Coto de Caza board of directors ever since
the board was coerced into bringing the CHP back for
pro-active traffic patrol, figures indicate that the
CHP is doing its job:
Trend for accident rate is down and close to
pre-firing levels.
Just as important, the number of Coto residents
arrested for DUI is down. See
chart below for actual accident rate. Law
Enforcement – Evil, Necessary Evil, Or Noble
Profession and Role Model?
In open societies, we posit that law enforcement
follows Winstren’s Law:
Law Enforcement Goes Where it is Needed and
Stays Where it is Wanted
Use any of the social networking managers below to share this or any other article with others....more bookmarking managers
|
ADVERTISEMENT
|
To subscribe/unsubscribe to the CotoBuzz Journal or send
Letters to the Editor
The CotoBuzz Journal P.O. Box 154 Trabuco Canyon, CA 92678 (509) 355-8895
Privacy Policy | Need Help? | Contact Us | Administrator: cotobuzz@yahoo.com