|
July 2008 ISSUE We do not make jokes, we simply watch the LA Times, the Orange County Register and CID/HOA board of directors and report the facts! |
||||||
|
Uncivil Homeowners Association (HOA) Wars The real problem for the LWV residents is the fear of retribution whether it is real or not June
22,
2008 LWV
residents are overjoyed over the recent
California Fourth District Appellate Court, as it
ruled in favor of the residents. But things are
heating up. According
to inside sources, meetings are becoming brawls. Some
board members and the managing agent and his top level
employees are becoming more and more hostile and
snappish. “As if they know the end is near and they
are snapping and barking as furiously as they can to
preserve any freedom they have left” During
the last GRF security committee meeting
(6-19/2008) Scott Dunham, the risk manager and Katy
Howe, Maintenance Administrative Services Manager gave
a presentation which included the information that it
is the obligation of an employer to protect
employees(cited is Public law 91-596, the Occupational
Safety and Health Act of 1970.) Katie Howe referred to
having spoken to "our counsel" and the
opinion rendered by that person yet the only
referenced opinion in her report is from Hart King and
Coldren which is not PCM's counsel but GRF's!! If
indeed, HKC is the counsel to whom she is referring
that means that HKC is representing BOTH the housing
mutuals and GRF as well as PCM , sort of like a
conflict of interest Former
GRF president George Portlock spoke about the need for
securing privileged information including bids under
consideration and member information that is
apparently just lying around on the second floor where
just anybody who floats by can read and perhaps misuse
information. It
is fair to say that competent security personnel
cannot leave sensitive documents just lying around and
the employee responsible for such documents becomes
liable for the loss of information. The
ability of a contractor to underbid another was an
example used by Portlock. If that's an issue here,
what is the matter with the supplier management
process being used, where documents are just left
floating around where just anybody can see them? However,
according to inside sources, immediately after a 3rd
mutual board meeting last Tuesday a member tried to
secure a membership list and was stonewalled by staff
on the second floor by saying it was "restricted
information" . Obviously the staff is not
adequately trained to understand exactly what the
residents do indeed, by law, have access to. Portlock
also said that there are only about 25 people who are
"making trouble" in the community. “The
man is still wearing blinders and has absolutely no
idea about how large the grass roots organization is
becoming and the anger and discontent the residents
feel”, added these sources In
the same security meeting one resident stood to speak
during the "community comments" period of
the meeting as listed on the agenda. She was
immediately interrupted by Erwin Stuller, chair, and
told he "didn't have a card" from her. He
was probably referring to the few index cards that had
been passed out to a few of the attendees prior to the
beginning of the meeting. He told people to write
their questions on them. When the resident said
she didn't have a card he shut her down - several
residents who spoke before her also did not have
"cards" and were allowed to speak - He told
her she was out of order and her time was up and she
had to sit down. When the resident objected firmly and
loudly the chief of security, Gene Hart, left the dias
(where he had been seated next to Stuller) and
approached the woman in a threatening manner...Hart is
at least 2 feet taller that this woman and
substantially heavier than she. She was in no way
physically threatening to anybody and was only
demanding to be heard as the others had been. When
Hart moved even closer to her and looked as though he
might grab hold of her (she was telling Stuller to go
ahead and have her thrown out or arrested and that
that she wanted that to happen) another resident from
the audience said firmly to Hart "don't you touch
her." Hart backed off slightly. Stuller then
called "recess" and stood beside his chair.
The atmosphere was very highly charged but it calmed
down and Stuller continued. It turns out that the
question she wanted to ask was "How many cars do
we have in Security?" Well worth the battle over
such a horrifying question. Stuller
shut another resident down completely in the same
manner later on using the same tactics. There was
public comment at the time about the three supposed
options being considered for the closing of the second
floor. It is of interest to note that the third option
was not published or even completely fleshed out by
the person who originated the idea in the agenda
package as it had only been mentioned to Stuller
before the meeting began. Stuller was there only
about 5 minutes before the meeting began. One
member put it very nicely when she said that this
whole debacle over the second floor being closed off
to residents is yet another divisive issue. She said
residents should take witnesses with them when they
visit the second floor. Access of all kinds is being
denied residents. If the managing agent and his
management staff are having difficulty with
individual residents and/or employees then they should
be dealt with as individuals and not tar the entire
community with the same brush. According
to inside sources, “one resident was vilified by
the managing agent and staff for trying to get
information. The case went to court where the resident
won a defamation suit. The management company’s
employees were the ones who had defamed this person
and tried to destroy his life, his reputation, his
ability to make a living, his pension and yet not a
single disciplinary action has been taken against
those managers” Board
members sit on the dais and call residents names.
Spouses of board members sit in the audience and call
board members who oppose their other halves filthy
names. Bob Miller started the last GRF meeting with a
long and wandering statement about how name
calling wouldn't be tolerated and at that very meeting
Erwin Stuller called a resident a "pompous
ass". Apparently the GRF board doesn't care to be
called "good old boys" or "guys"
and yet Ray Gros, GRF member called a resident
"sweetheart" in the security meeting while
he was being condescending to her and to the rest of
the audience. The gasp that arose from the audience at
that time demonstrated to him the blunder he made and
he backpedalled as fast as he could blaming his
"southern" roots for his faux pas. “A
third board member went into a tirade at the last
board meeting using expletives and ending with
"Jesus Christ" because there was, as usual
under the doubtful leadership of Cynthia Connors, yet
more strife and disagreement during the meeting”, added our sources. . This same member spoke twice at a
recent GRF Finance committee meeting and couldn't seem
to contain his expletive usage for even the two brief
moments he spoke then. This same member told the third
board meeting that "the duty of directors is to
enhance the community and we have to spend money to
enhance the community. " Obviously this man has
not read the bylaws, the CC&Rs or even the
Davis-Sterling act about what the responsibility of a
director is. It sure isn't to "enhance the
community and spend money to do so", our source
added Bob
Miller and Harry Curtis (past third and GRF president)
sat together at the last third board meeting and after
Connors had spent over 8 minutes by the clock
telling members that there would be order and
discipline and she would tolerate no outbursts, side
conversations, etc and that she would use her
gavel often , discussed Miller's prostate, Miller's
xerographic copy of pelvic x-rays and in general had a
tea party that precluded anybody sitting within 20
feet of them hearing what was actually going on in the
meeting. When shushed Harry Curtis turned and told the
person shushing them to SHUT UP. The only person
Connors gaveled was Stan Feldstein when she no longer
wanted to hear his argument about an issue. Feldstein,
as CotoBuzz readers may recall, was politically
assassinated, prior to Connor s taking over. Connors
was called on her limit of 3 minutes per comment per
director when Carol Moore, third director, reminded Connors
of the rule Connors had put in place. Our sources
added that “Connors denied that there was ever a
3 minute speaking rule for directors and Moore
reminded her of the last meeting where secretary Larry
Souza had been told to time Moore and Sousa had to
agree that that had indeed happened. It's all still on
the tapes of the meetings and Connors was left
babbling in the wind and still pretending to be in
control and in the right” When
Feldstein tried to make another remark during a debate
Connors interrupted him and gaveled him to silence
saying that Feldstein had already been heard from and
could not speak again.
Related Stories
CotoBlogzz Tagzz - use any number of social networking managers to share this (or any other articles in the Internet) with others...click here and select social bookmarkings threads RELATED
STORIES The
Devil Made me Do It - Blame it on the Loopholes Is this general manager (Milt Johns) over his head in his management skills? Can someone come out with only experience from the garden to manage a 90 million dollar business without a conflict of interest? When is the last time Mr. Johns lowered our costs... The
Wealth (or Erosion of) of Homeowners Association
Laguna
Woods Village CC&Rs, What CC&Rs? I Got Your
CC&Rs Right Here! Should
I stay or should I go - in/from my HOA? X Mirror,
mirror on the wall, who is the fairest gladiator of
them all? Chuck
Chuckles: Senator Schumer, That is Pssst,
Can I Interest You In a Lawyer? Dare's
role in Pastures cost association $100,000 IF
You Can Keep Your Home - Apologies to Rudyard Kipling
Use any of the social networking managers below to share this or any other article with others....more bookmarking managers
|
ADVERTISEMENT
|
To subscribe/unsubscribe to the CotoBuzz Journal or send
Letters to the Editor
The CotoBuzz Journal P.O. Box 154 Trabuco Canyon, CA 92678 (509) 355-8895
Privacy Policy | Need Help? | Contact Us | Administrator: cotobuzz@yahoo.com