|
September 2008 ISSUE We do not make jokes, we simply watch the LA Times, the Orange County Register and CID/HOA board of directors and report the facts! |
||||||||
|
LETTERS LWV Double the Trouble, Double the Fun?
August
13,
2008 To
Whom it Might Concern (Apparently
only Mike Curtis): Since
it seems to be in the best interest of (?who?) for PCM
to get a General Contracting License (obviously (?) to
do contracting work for LWV) maybe they should get a
"Roofing License" so that they can do our
roofing, too. Let's see now, if we do our own general
building contracting our costs are based on a
"zero based budget" (per the GM) with no
overhead included. If this new entity is doing our
work, would PCM (a for profit company) charge us
overhead (profit), or do Disbro and Olsen work for
nothing? I
guess PCM became a billion dollar corporation by
having the owners work for nothing. But
then, this General Building Contractor
"entity" might have nothing to do with LWV,
other than using our (LWV) Human Resources employees
to answer phone calls to this "entity."
In addition, could it be that the 84% increase in the
Management Fee over the past few years is to
cover costs for the time that the GM (who is
supposed to work exclusively for us) is doing his work
for the General Building Contractor "entity"
of which he is the CEO/President? When
we hear the wailing and gnashing of teeth by PCM
over residents wandering through the PCM offices
pilfering confidential information, is this the kind
of data that they are alluding to and fear getting out
to the public? How many Directors were aware of
this? How many Directors would condone keeping this
information from the owners? When did they pass a
motion allowing this to happen? Why wasn't it made
public, or is it intended that this should not
get out to the owners? PCM
and the Boards are a "charade" with the
apparent intent by PCM to keep the Boards in the dark
and lead them by the nose. When will the Boards take
steps to do their duty and provide oversight to the
managing of LWV? If they can't do it, then they should
take steps to hire someone to do it for US. If
PCM and the Boards restrict the owners efforts
to glean information, perhaps an investigative
reporter would have the expertise to bring to light
the impact of what PCM is doing, including the intent
at the last GRF Board meeting to lease some of our
property to an "undisclosed" contractor
without the Board even being aware of who the
contractor was. Was this in our best interest, or,
PCM's? I'm
sure that PCM will say that everything they do is
ethical and in our best interest. I'll believe that
when they tell us "Everything They Do!"
CotoBlogzz Tagzz - use any number of social networking managers to share this (or any other articles in the Internet) with others...click here and select social bookmarkings threads
COMMENTS
CotoBlogzz Tagzz - use any number of social networking managers to share this (or any other articles in the Internet) with others...click here and select social bookmarkings threads RELATED STORIES New
Golden Rain Foundation Rules of Engagement $2
million Verdict Returned Against Homeowners
Association GRF
2009 Budget Review, Be There or Be Out of Luck! Different
Homeowners Association, Same Issues The
Right LWV Leadership for Such a Time as This? Working
to Serve, Or Serving To Work - Letter to OC Register
Columnist To
Destroy a Community, or to Destroy the Status
Quo?XThat is the Question in this Letter to the
Menifee SCCA Board of Directors
Use any of the social networking managers below to share this or any other article with others....more bookmarking managers
|
ADVERTISEMENT
|
To subscribe/unsubscribe to the CotoBuzz Journal or send
Letters to the Editor
The CotoBuzz Journal P.O. Box 154 Trabuco Canyon, CA 92678 (509) 355-8895
Privacy Policy | Need Help? | Contact Us | Administrator: cotobuzz@yahoo.com