|
August 2008 ISSUE We do not make jokes, we simply watch the LA Times, the Orange County Register and CID/HOA board of directors and report the facts! |
||||||
|
Schwarzenegger says No bills will get signed until there is a budget! - a Small Step for California Voters August 13, 2008 Buzz
CotoBlogzz Tagzz - use any number of social networking managers to share this (or any other articles in the Internet) with others...click here and select social bookmarkings threads RELATED
STORIES
Use any of the social networking managers below to share this or any other article with others....more bookmarking managers
|
ADVERTISEMENT
|
To subscribe/unsubscribe to the CotoBuzz Journal or send
Letters to the Editor
The CotoBuzz Journal P.O. Box 154 Trabuco Canyon, CA 92678 (509) 355-8895
Privacy Policy | Need Help? | Contact Us | Administrator: cotobuzz@yahoo.com
In a scathing op-ed piece titled California Association of Realtors: Pick a Lane! Donie Vanitzian, co-author of the Los Angeles Times Associations column, blasts Gary Quackenbush and the California Association of Realtors (CAR) for their support of Assembly Bill 2259, which she characterizes as "a farce, a contradiction in both terms and alliances", then goes on to describe how she put CAR, Los Angeles Mayor
Villaraigosa, and Congressman Rosendahl's on notice about the problems with A 2259. "Remarkably, Assembly Bill 2259 now contradicts provisions written into Assembly Bill 980 sponsored by none other than, the California Association of Realtors" Vanitizian writes.
Vanitzian then concludes that "CAR and the California legislature want it both ways", indicating that CAR and the legislature want to "decide whether or not a homeowners association can amend, rewrite, and restate covenants, conditions, and restrictions as it relates to renters and rental property." That the only reason this piece of legislation is now getting attention is "because of the housing crunch", and that "just as CAR appeared to have failed in performing the vital due diligence in pushing Assembly Bill 980, so too, they failed to perform the proper due diligence with Assembly Bill 2259. The difference this time? I refuse to tip them off as to what conflicts exist." Shewrites.
Never mind that the Orange County BoS want to obsolete common interest developments (as in getting rid of the "islands in the county"
Never mind that AB2259 is a classic example of the Bigger Governmentparadigm we are now all too familiar with: Assembly Bill 2259establishes a California Building Rehabilitation Code Advisory Council ("Council") to advise the advisory panels of the State Building Standard Commission on the possible adoption of state buildingrehabilitation guidelines.
Specifically, this bill: Establishes the Council with an UNSPECIFIED NUMBER of members, all appointed by the director of the Commission.Members shall include, but not be limited to
representatives from the following organizations:
* California Building Standards Commission;
* Department of Housing and Community Development;
* Division of the State Architect;
* Office of the State Fire Marshal;
* California Energy Commission;
* League of California Cities;
* California State Association of Counties;
* California Building Industry Association;
* Building Owners and Managers Association;
* County Building Officials Association of California;
* California Building Officials;
* American Institute of Architects California Council;
* California Apartment Association;
* Structural Engineers Association of California;
* Concrete Masonry Association of California and Nevada;
* California Hotel and Motel Association;
* Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors of California;
* California Business Properties Association; and,
* California Association of Realtors.
And directs the Council to make recommendations and yada, yada,
yada....................
We have asked CAR to comment on Vanitzian's op-ed piece, but have notheard from them.
* This is the California Legislature
* This is your CID wallet
* Any Questions?